Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: The Anti-One

So, um, this too is “Bush’s fault”?

You people are obsessed.


3 posted on 12/08/2008 7:40:07 AM PST by JennysCool (Internet Powerhouse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JennysCool
So, um, this too is “Bush’s fault”?

You people are obsessed.

What's wrong with expecting a man to do the job he's being paid to do? And how are those expectations an obsession?

Just curious.

10 posted on 12/08/2008 7:44:48 AM PST by The Anti-One (So likewise ye, when ye shall see all these things, know that it is near, even at the doors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: JennysCool

>>>So, um, this too is “Bush’s fault”?

Bush is not in a position to challenge the outcome of the election.

Those who were in a position to challenge it did so, and the Supreme court by refusing to hear this issue has now taken full responsibility.

The coming constitutional crisis and civil breakdown rests squarely on their heads.

I now blame SCROTUS


11 posted on 12/08/2008 7:46:21 AM PST by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson