Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Conscience of a Conservative

Again, let me be clear...

You said: “Quite frankly, you are using these writers to attempt to prove a point (that there can be citizens by birth who are not natural-born citizens) that the writers themselves would consider absurd.”

No, the current operative interpretation of the 14th Amendment is is absurd, not the point being made about the meaning of “natural born”.


50 posted on 12/08/2008 3:08:25 AM PST by The Watcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: The Watcher
No, the current operative interpretation of the 14th Amendment is is absurd, not the point being made about the meaning of “natural born”.

Except that the "current operative interpretation of the 14th Amendment" is the interpretation of the Amendment that has governed for the vast majority of the time since the Amendment was passed.

54 posted on 12/08/2008 3:22:19 AM PST by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: The Watcher

You are so right. I cannot understand why people cannot wrap their mind around what a natural born citizen is. It even says in the Amendment, children of aliens are exempt.


65 posted on 12/08/2008 4:04:07 AM PST by panthermom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson