Once again: Yes, they sought to avoid competing allegiances, but they did so by ensuring that the President was born a citizen of this country.
You have still yet to cite anything suggesting that there has ever been a third "type" of citizen.
You have not read what I have cited. Read what BP2 posted, then read Tucker said -- and Bingham in the article which starts this thread.
They are both utterly clear: 1. born in the nation and, 2. born of an American citizen father.
Your source Jill Pryor just created one out of the thin air over Yale Law School:
"As historical and textual analysis has shown, a citizen may be both "naturalized" and "natural born." Under the naturalized born approach, any person with a right to American citizenship under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States at the time of his or her birth is a natural-born citizen for purposes of presidential eligibility."
What, in God's name, is a naturalized born citizen???? Are you guys for real???