Islamic Extremists Do Not Make Good Neighbors

The recent terrorist attacks in Mumbai, India, have nothing to do with the “Kashmir dispute”. Nor do Islamic terrorist attacks on Israel have anything to do with the “Jerusalem dispute”, or the “Palestinian dispute”, anymore than the Islamic extremism in the Philippines has to do with Minanao and Sulu “dispute”, or “Moro dispute”, or this dispute or that dispute, Chechnya, Bosnia, Bedouin dispute, Armenian dispute, Cyprus dispute, northern Tunisia dispute, the “Bhairava Pole” dispute in Banaras India – on and on, unprovoked and savage Islamic oppression and subjugation of others be it in Iraq, Persia, Egypt, Asia, Byzantium, Afriqiya, India, on and on and now encroaching on Europe, Islamic Extremism in the name of “liberation” is actually the Imperialism of Islamic extremists. Liberals try to think they are so “progressive”, smarter than everyone else, and like a race horse wearing blinders they narrow their vision down to a very contracted and tapered idea, “perspectives” that are really about making excuses for the extremism, making the world feel more comfortable for themselves and their fears, i.e. not seeing the forest for the trees, e.g. terrorism in Mumbai is about the “Kashmir dispute”. Arrogantly they also try to claim that such narrow minded excuses for this extremism, which is really all about blaming the West, blaming liberty and hating their own forefathers, that this narrow minded outlook somehow reflects their intimacy with “history”. When in fact they miss entirely the larger historical picture - certainly they have no historical perspective of Islamic extremism at all. All of these excuses miss the mark, the so-called “liberals”, who are actually leftists that sympathize with this extremism, simply cannot accept the reality that Islamic extremists do not make good neighbors.

In many ways, these “liberals” and the Islamic extremists share a lot in common. They both believe they are “new” and are the “future” – for example, anyone with any intelligence knows that the Islamic extremists want to take us all back into the Eighth Century, they want to turn the clock backwards. But that is not how the Islamic extremists see it. They see their movement, their religion, as the “new religion”, that God Allah has brought this new dynamic into the world to replace all the old demons, all the old religions, with the “new”. The old is “dirty”, but Islam, which is “new”, is “clean”. They see it as cleaning house, a new day. All the old demons, the Jews for example, must be gone from this place. The old powers will now be replaced with the new power of Islam throughout the world.

You see? Liberals call themselves “progressives”, but all they really want is to turn the clock backwards - they have nothing “new” to bring us, it is the “same old - same old”, big powerful government, subjugation just like Islam. The Islamists also think of themselves are progressives. So, in a sort of twisted way, the same liberals actually sympathize with the Islamic extremists, or even think of them as “liberators” fighting “Western Colonialism” and other such insanity.

The recent Islamic terrorist attack in Mumbai, coming from the heart of modern day politicized 20th Century Islamic terrorist movement which we today call Pakistan, has nothing to do with the “Kashmir dispute”. Sure, the Kashmir dispute exists. There’s always some dispute. Even when Islam is the neighbor of some other Islamic “state”, they end up having some “dispute” – trying to prove who is “more Moslem” than the other. Shia killing Sunni, Iran and Iraq, and so on. What’s so new in this? Islamic extremists cannot even make good neighbors with other Islamic states, much less non-Islamic peoples. Once they “take over”, that is not the end – they “compartmentalize” their Islam into even more “disputes” around particular “aspects” of Islam which eventually turns into an argument about who is the better Muslim and who is going to have to be (first) taxed, to be (second) subjugated, to be (eventually) killed.

In regards to the “Kashmir dispute”, when conservatives such as myself state the obvious, such as the fact that Islamic extremists do not make good neighbors, liberals try to claim that conservatives are ignoring the issue, the “long standing” and “historical” analysis of it all.

The fact is, conservatives know more about the specifics of the “Kashmir dispute” than most liberals. They know all about it. They read more “history books”, they watch and read the real news and not the phony liberal news. They are “technicians of history” in every regard. So yes, there is the “Kashmir dispute”, and I can tell you that conservatives for the most part have a much broader and in-depth understanding of this “dispute” than liberals do since the conservative constituency almost always has a much more knowledgeable interest in and understanding of history overall than the liberal constituency. But there will always be some sort of dispute when Islamic extremists are your neighbors, and after these same Islamic extremists take over Mexico (God forbid) then the United States will be faced with the “Texas dispute” and so on. These disputes are only varnish on the painting – the painting itself is all about Islamic subjugation of others and the dominance of the “new religion” and “Islamic law” which is seen by the Islamic extremists as the “future” and as the progression of humankind to the utopian vision which is birthed from death of the “demons”, death of the “old”, and thus “progressive”. Islamists know that their new religion has direct borrowings from the old religion of Judaism, and in part this was true because Jews were their neighbors and they learned from them. They learned from the Jews, and they learned from the Christians as well. They borrowed this and that. But then, after they borrowed so much from Jews who were their neighbors, suddenly the “new” (Islam) needed to destroy the “old” (Judaism), and since Islamic extremists never make good neighbors these same extremists now want to finally achieve one of their main objectives they never definitively achieved hundreds of years ago, an objective they have had since the “beginning” (of Islam), and that is to destroy the “old”, to get rid of the “Jews” who are their neighbors. After all, it’s sort of an embarrassment for them to have their “mentors” around, since they don’t want to give anyone else credit for anything, they got to be rid of them.

So don’t be confused or distracted by the excuses, the “Kashmir dispute”, or any other “dispute”. That isn’t the real issue, that isn’t the root cause. If it wasn’t Kashmir, it would be Hyderabad, it would be the Taj Mahal itself. Did you know the tomb of the Taj Mahal was probably built right on top of what was a Hindu Shiva Temple? Such “acquisitions” are a form of propaganda in motion, direct action, Imperialism, “new age” grabbing of this or that holy spot and then making it your own. They tear down the temples, the church, whatever is the “holy spot”, and build a mosque on top of it, or a tomb. In that way, those who were going to the “holy spot” now will go and find a mosque. You can enter and submit, or there’s going to be trouble. They build the mosque on top of Solomon’s temple. You can enter and submit, or there’s going to be trouble. They would have torn down the pyramids of Egypt if they could, and then build a mosque on top of it. In fact, eventually if they take over the world, that is exactly what they will finely do. Every Buddha is coming down, blown up. The pyramids, gone. The naked statue of David, smashed by a hammer. A mosque will be standing in its place. Or a tomb.

One day, they will go to Roswell New Mexico – where the “flying saucer” supposedly crashed. If folks turn Roswell into a “pilgrimage”, if one day enough “new agers” would turn Roswell New Mexico into a UFO-ology “holy spot” of eminence, then Islam will go there. They will tear down the old barn in the sand. And they will build a mosque on top. You can enter and submit, or there’s going to be trouble. And you are next. You, the American, the Brit, the Aussie or whatever you are if you are not them, you are now the Jew. Submit or die. The closer they get to you, the next “dispute” will be your neighbor.

http://www.newenglishreview.org/blog_display.cfm/blog_id/13782
What Muslim Population Increase Brings

Don Morris writes at Doc’s Talk (thanks to Janet Levy):

...As long as the Muslim population remains around 1% of any given country they will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to anyone. In fact, they may be featured in articles and films, stereotyped for their colorful uniqueness:

United States — Muslim 1.0%
Australia — Muslim 1.5%
Canada — Muslim 1.9%
China — Muslim 1%-2%
Italy — Muslim 1.5%
Norway — Muslim 1.8%

At 2% and 3% they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs:

Denmark — Muslim 2%
Germany — Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom — Muslim 2. 7%
Spain — Muslim 4%
Thailand — Muslim 4.6%

From 5% on they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population.

They will push for the introduction of halaal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply. (United States).

France — Muslim 8%
Philippines — Muslim 5%
Sweden — Muslim 5%
Switzerland — Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands — Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad & Tobago — Muslim 5.8%

At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islam is not to convert the world but to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions (Paris — car-burnings). Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats (Amsterdam — Mohammed cartoons).

Guyana — Muslim 10%
India — Muslim 13.4%
Israel — Muslim 16%
Kenya — Muslim 10%
Russia — Muslim 10-15%

After reaching 20% expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue burning:

Ethiopia — Muslim 32.8%

At 40% you will find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks and ongoing militia warfare:

Bosnia — Muslim 40%
Chad — Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon — Muslim 59.7%

From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels:

Albania — Muslim 70%
Malaysia — Muslim 60.4%
Qatar — Muslim 77.5%
Sudan — Muslim 70%

After 80% expect State run ethnic cleansing and genocide:

Bangladesh — Muslim 83%
Egypt — Muslim 90%
Gaza — Muslim 98.7%
Indonesia — Muslim 86.1%
Iran — Muslim 98%
Iraq — Muslim 97%
Jordan — Muslim 92%
Morocco — Muslim 98.7%
Pakistan — Muslim 97%
Palestine — Muslim 99%
Syria — Muslim 90%
Tajikistan — Muslim 90%
Turkey — Muslim 99.8%
United Arab Emirates — Muslim 96%

100% will usher in the peace of “Dar-es-Salaam” — the Islamic House of Peace — there’s supposed to be peace because everybody is a Muslim:

Afghanistan — Muslim 100%
Saudi Arabia — Muslim 100%
Somalia — Muslim 100%
Yemen — Muslim 99.9%

Of course, that’s not the case. To satisfy their blood lust, Muslims then start killing each other for a variety of reasons.

“Before I was nine I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; and the tribe against the world. And all of us against the infidel. — Leon Uris, “The Haj”...

Adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond’s book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.