Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: hamboy
"Neither the Supreme Court, nor the electors who will soon cast their votes for president, are impartial bodies."

That's too obviously true. HOWEVER, I don't see legal minds of the caliber of Roberts, Scalia, and 3 or 4 other justices just shrugging this issue aside. Would these types of minds and egos want their reputation for all time to reflect that they just didn't give a damn about the plain wording of the Constitution?

That makes no sense to me at all.

4 posted on 12/02/2008 3:20:01 PM PST by willgolfforfood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: willgolfforfood
That's too obviously true. HOWEVER, I don't see legal minds of the caliber of Roberts, Scalia, and 3 or 4 other justices just shrugging this issue aside. Would these types of minds and egos want their reputation for all time to reflect that they just didn't give a damn about the plain wording of the Constitution?
That makes no sense to me at all.


I would like to believe that Chief Justice Roberts, along with Justices Scalia, Alito and Thomas will constitute the 4 judges that will choose to take up this issue. I cannot imagine those four jurists deciding that to determine the eligibility of an alleged natural citizen to serve in the highest office in the Land is an inconsequential matter.

If they fail to address this issue properly, our Republic is lost.
25 posted on 12/02/2008 3:49:10 PM PST by mkjessup (The lamestream media WELCOMES our new Communist/Obamunist Overlords & Politburo!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson