[[The article is written by Creationists for Creationists and for only one reason, because guilt by association is all the standing they have,]]
lol- I just popped into htis thread and read this comment- please tell me you didn’t jjust say that? Still laughing- Acording to soem in htis thread- ID is dismantled by tryign to associate it with Creationism- ID is dismantled by trying to associate it with the OPINIONS of some scientists in the field OUTSIDE of the actual science- and ID is dissaembled by tryign to associate it with a few websites who have soem particular statements of faith-
You folks are really precious- Honest- If nothign else- you all is consistently hypocritical
I.D. IS creationism, as the poorly constructed “cdesign proponentist” shows. The Creationists were too stupid to even use the ‘find/replace’ function for their manuscript and poorly replaced “creationist” with “design proponent” leaving several ‘transitional fossils’ of ‘cdesign proponentists’. I.D. is a political movement of one organization, the “Discovery Institute”, and its “Wedge document” shows that their goal is nothing less than the destruction of the foundation of science.