[Ethan Clive Osgoode]

Is gambling non-teleological or do you think God is in control of who wins and who loses? Random is not synonymous with ‘not under God's control’.

So then, in your perverse view, the usual examples of design and intelligible order in nature do not in any way point to a designing mind, but gambling and random events do.

[allmendream]

Say what? You cannot answer the question so you try to put words in my mouth?

I DO think that intelligible order in nature speaks to the majesty of our Lord God. I just don’t buy into the notion of those that think that because we observe that mutations happen randomly (like a dice roll) that it somehow means PERVERSLY (because you seem to like the word) that God is not in control of random events.

So I ask you again...

Is gambling non-teleological or do you think God is in control of who wins and who loses?