And you have confirmed my point. Just because you decry the idea that “irreducible complexity” is an appeal to “god of the gaps” doesn't make me pointing out that this is exactly what it is incorrect.
You think “irreducible complexity” is a gap in the explanatory power of natural selection, and you wish to fill that gap with the unmeasurable, unreplicable and unpredictable (and thus unscientific) power of “the designer”.
If irreducible complexity were proven, it would be evidence that the current evolutionary model is flawed. It would not prove that there is a God, or that he created.
So you've proven my point a third time. Really, you're too generous.