‘And if he ignores the writ, supposedly the SCOTUS will be insulted—WE WILL SEE????’
Didn’t Obama already ignore it? In Greg Garre’s waiver to respond it was for the Federal Election Commision, et al meaning the Solicitor General was waiving the right for all 3 defendants to respond
but we will see soon enough find out ... excerpted from SCOTUS website:
| No. 08-570 | ||||
| Title: |
|
|||
| Docketed: | October 31, 2008 | |||
| Lower Ct: | United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit |
| Case Nos.: | (08-4340) |
| Rule 11 |
| ~~~Date~~~ | ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| Oct 30 2008 | Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment filed. (Response due December 1, 2008) |
| Oct 31 2008 | Application (08A391) for an injunction pending disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter. |
| Nov 3 2008 | Supplemental brief of applicant Philip J. Berg filed. |
| Nov 3 2008 | Application (08A391) denied by Justice Souter. |
| Nov 18 2008 | Waiver of right of respondents Federal Election Commission, et al. to respond filed. |
http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08-570.htm