The verbage was USE by not sell by.. keyword “USE”.. Insinuating that women should be “used” is a little different than refering to mexifornia as the land of fruits and nuts.. IMHO and I see no hipocracy Vehrstehen Sei?
So “selling” a woman is better than “using” one? Uh, OK.
Look, I fully agree I was crude. My intent was to convey disgust for this used-up-pin-up in a pithy way, which I did.
She stormed into a courtroom, threated her replacement (described a “brunette,” as if to draw a contrast) waiving her wedding ring of her pending-divorcee husband -— who was on trial for bribing union officials.
She threatened to prejudice the jury by making a scene.
She was so out-of-control a federal judge sat a federal marshall down next to her.
That’s pretty much the Third Act in the life of a used-up-Hamptons bimbet, if I ever heard one.
WAY past her sell-by date.
Psst, it’s ‘hypocrisy’ (as I showed you), and you reek of it. Good attempt at a troll, better luck next time.
BTW, chicks like her use, and expect to get used in return. They basically have sex for money. They treat men like they treat themselves - chattel. What’s that make them? I think you know the answer, too.