Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Diplomat

The works ARE public domain in England. It is a matter for the ports to not permit import of such compilations as they would be in violation of US copyright law.

That is why there is a big stink over the works POST 1959 lapsing into the public domain.


16 posted on 12/01/2008 10:35:37 AM PST by weegee (Sec. of State Clinton. What kind of change is it to keep the Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton Oligarchy?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: weegee
So you are arguing that English law takes precedence over American law with regard to copyrights held by Americans? It doesn't even by British law if your statement about the ports is accurate. I.e., the “Customs” is responsible for preventing the import of copyrighted works, etc.

A larger question is what about the works of the Beatles? I thought an American record company sold the rights to Micheal Jackson a decade or so back. Who's law applies here? BTW, If MJ renounces his American citizenship, then whose law takes precedence?

My point on American copyrighted work still stands: “No one can tell you when any song/copyrighted work becomes Public Domain because current federal law appears to allow these works to be held in perpetuity. Long after the originator has died. Don't believe me, “Happy Birthday” is NOT in the public domain.

19 posted on 12/01/2008 1:46:48 PM PST by Diplomat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson