Posted on 11/29/2008 4:13:03 PM PST by javachip
A Ruger 22/45 Mk III Target model followed me home from the gunshow last weekend and with all the posts about firearms lately, I thought a range report was in order.
The pistol is a .22 with a 5.5 inch barrel. The receiver is polymer with the grip angle, slide release, magazine release and safety located similar to a 1911. Ruger uses much of the same internals as their standard .22 pistol. They get around the different grip angle by running the magazine at a fore and aft angle across the grip. It feels a little strange the first few times seating the mag since it doesn’t slide in parallel to the grip.
I tried three types of ammo. Federal value pack from Walmart, PMC Scoremaster (no longer produced), and Wolf Match Target. I fired about 30 rounds of the Federal just to get familiar with the pistol and then fired three, five shot groups with each ammo from a rest at 25 yards to sight it in. The Federal had a number of stovepipe jams (empty case didn’t fully eject). No function issues with the PMC or Wolf.
With the Federal, two of the groups were incomplete because one round was off the paper. The one complete five-shot group measured 4.6” center-to-center. I doubt the other two would have been any smaller if I’d have been able to include the off target rounds.
The PMC groups measured 3.3”, 4.2” and 0.9” center-to-center.
The Wolf groups measured 3.1”, 2.1” and 3.8” center-to-center.
Shooting was indoors at the NRA Range.
Those relative results are consistent with my Ruger MkIII Hunter, Federal value pack ok, much better accuracy with the Wolf MT and Scoremaster, but the Hunter hasn’t had problems with stovepipes. That may go away with some break in time.
I’m out of practice and the aging eyes have trouble keeping the front sight focused, so no doubt with some more practice or a better marksman, those groups could tighten up a bit. I was firing from a support, resting my wrist on a piece of foam on top of the pistol box.
I don’t have a gauge, but would guess the trigger pull at 5-7 pounds. The trigger isn’t bad, but serious target shooters or competitors would want some work done. This one has a much heavier pull than the Hunter.
Ruger engineers are apparently entering a contest for most difficult pistol on the planet to field strip – put the magazine in, dry fire, take the magazine out, pull the bolt pin assy, put the magazine back in, pull the bolt, take the magazine back out, separate the barrel assy and frame…. It took several blows with a mallet to get the barrel assembly off. Tight fits are good, but this was ridiculous. Managed to draw blood from fingers on both hands getting it field stripped and back together.
All and all, I’m happy with the pistol. I’m considering joining a bullseye shooting league and would use the Hunter for that, but this one would be a decent backup.
yes, I just received the Eyepal. It works great for me. I used to shoot my longer barreled revolvers more because I could focus better on the front sight. At $27 , I have been trying to come up with the plastic that would work.
The merit optical has the advantage of having the peep on a hinge so that it can be lifted out of the field of vision. Lots of shooters like these better but they run about $57.
Either way they do work.
That's about where the compliments end.
If there are enough purchases the pols could get addicted to the flowing tax revenues.
Is there some reason that you didn’t evaluate the best rimfire ammunition (CCI) in your tests?
I didn’t happen to have any CCI on hand.
Since Scoremaster was discontinued and the end of my stash is in sight, I need to restart a grand experiment searching for reliable, cheap, accurate .22 ammo. The Wolf Match Target qualifies as reliable and accurate, but it’s a bit pricey for plinking. Which of CCI’s .22 ammo would you recommend?
‘course at the rate I haven’t been getting to the range, the couple bricks of Scoremaster I have left may last the rest of my life.
If you spot some of the CCI “SGB” (Small Game Bullet) ammo at a gun show, pick some up and try it. Although it’s no longer in production, some vendors still have it in stock. My Mk II Competition Target likes the stuff better than CCI Green Tag. YMMV, of course.
Check the price of ammo.
"Blazer for plinking". "Stinger" for hunting (it kills 30% deader!)
Whoops. Looks like the SGB ammo is back on CCI’s website. Don’t know why it dropped off for a while there, but I’m happy to see it back. Time for me to stock up!
Awesome! I was afraid to shoot more than 3 as it may ruin the group ;-)
I wish a firearm would follow me home...
A Remington 700? Those look like .22 holes.
I didn’t have a spotting scope so I had no idea the group was any good.
Look at the bottom right bull at the 6. That is a .22 hole.
I’m sure they monitor this website 24/7.
DU, Kos, Huffingstuff Post, not so much.
No, popular models of lever-action are on the new Assault Weapons Ban bill. Big-name bolt-actions will be among the first to go.
Ah yeah
I haven’t looked at targets I have in a little while, so I forgot what paper abused by .22 rounds looks like.
For the main target, are those 5.56 or 7.62 holes?
Unfortunately, the credit card bill followed along with the pistol ;)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.