Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: 21twelve

The sad thing is that the tool bag probably had tools in it that have a $10 Craftsman equivalent. Maybe the coating that made them not brittle at absolute zero would be different, but I find it very difficult to believe that the $100k wasn’t mostly waste.


63 posted on 11/28/2008 1:18:42 PM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: mysterio; 21twelve

You said — “The sad thing is that the tool bag probably had tools in it that have a $10 Craftsman equivalent. Maybe the coating that made them not brittle at absolute zero would be different, but I find it very difficult to believe that the $100k wasn’t mostly waste.”

I seriously doubt that the $100,000 toolbag (if that’s what it did cost, and I don’t know that for sure) — was a waste. I think that whatever tools that they had (and I don’t even know that..., so it could become obvious once one knows that), that they had to meet whatever specifications that NASA demanded, and that bids were put out for contractors to come up with a price for whatever bid items that NASA had.

And so — if Ace Hardware could have bid a lot lower, I’m sure they would have won the bid... LOL...


64 posted on 11/28/2008 2:35:43 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson