Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: yankeedame

In the past, GM vehicles typically had problems with electical components after 40k miles. Ford’s weak spot was usually the transmission at 60K. I swore off (and at) both many years ago.


41 posted on 11/26/2008 7:28:29 AM PST by Kirkwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Kirkwood

You are exactly right. I have said on other threads, GM and Ford would do well if their vehicles would outlast the average finance contract. When you see Nissan, Toyotas and Hondas out there with near 200,000 miles, it’s hard not to notice. Not that there aren’t the occassional GM and Ford with that mileage, but I don’t think it’s anywhere near the same number.


66 posted on 11/26/2008 7:43:45 AM PST by autumnraine (Churchill: " we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall never surrender")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: Kirkwood
Ford’s weak spot was usually the transmission at 60K.

I bought a brand new 1976 Ford Granada whose transmission had to be replaced at 36,000 miles. That was only the start of my troubles with that piece of junk. I have never bought a Ford since. I figure a Honda lasts twice as long as a Big 3 car.

174 posted on 11/26/2008 11:07:20 AM PST by TexasRepublic (Comrade, can you spare a slice of bread?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson