[DieHard the Hunter]

> You hear that, Kanawa? Diehard is willing to let you keep your dog because...What’s the reason, again, Diehard?

Because the dog he owns isn’t the same sort as the dog I’d like to see banned. He does not own what I understand to be a “Pit Bull”: there are obvious differences that stand out like, well, like dog’s bollix.

No gangsta in NZ would want to own Sam. Even tho’ Sam can fight bears. He just isn’t the “right” dog.

> My dog’s ears are pretty atypical of the breed,

Pit Bulls are not a “breed”. They are dangerous mungrel mutts bred to be vicious and dangerous. You can never be quite sure what is in them: often there is some Staffie, some Rottie, and some Ridgeback, but it really is any man’s guess.

You probably don’t own a Pit Bull, either. You may *think* you do, but you probably don’t.

So all this time and energy you’ve spent defending dangerous dogs has been wasted: “barking up the wrong tree”, “chasing your tail” and “howling at the moon”.

I love a nice hot funny, too!

Now perhaps we can get to the serious business of exterminating Pit Bull dangerous mungrel mutts, ay?

[kanawa]

If what you call Pit Bulls are different from what we call Pit bulls
then your agitating people here to exterminate them is misplaced and dangerous.

Btw what’s a pig dog?

[LongElegantLegs]

Because the dog he owns isn’t the same sort as the dog I’d like to see banned. He does not own what I understand to be a “Pit Bull”:

Well then, in the future, instead of incorrectly refering to 'pit bulls', perhaps you could correctly identify the animals you want to ban as 'any random dog that happens to make Diehard soil his undergarments by looking scary'.

Thanks. :-)