Um, he was opposing pit restrictions.
Yes, because people think his weimaraners are ‘pit bull-type’ dogs.
You accused him for thinking like a gangbanger for desiring to protect his personal property from these theoretical bounty hunters.
“Um, Mr Inviso owns weimaraners.
Um, he was opposing pit restrictions”
Um, no, I was opposing someone’s little vigilante fantasy of what they want to be pit restrictions, to the point of being able to shoot other peoples’ dogs on sight. Someone wants a pretty well unrestricted hunting license for dogs that aren’t theirs, to be able to shoot what THEY THINK, WITHOUT ANY TRAINING, AND WITH PROBABLY DARN LITTLE KNOWLEDGE, is a pit. Someone, like you, who judges based on very little info, (like your dumb crack about gang-banger mentality) and wants to be judge, jury, and executioner. Ever heard of a little thing called “due process”? It’s supposed to be required before you deprive people of life, liberty, or property. That means (in this case)you have someone who knows what they are doing, decide what is and isn’t a pit, THEN anything that is legally required is done properly, instead of firing upon, let’s say, a dog in a backyard that ISN’T YOURS.