[auntyfemenist]

actually, in this case she has turned from working in an immoral business and is trying to live a decent life. Why speak against her now? I don’t think you shouldn’t call out someone who has turned away from sin.

[apocalypto]

I agree. And people do change. Still, she should not be with children. I would not want my children around her. One reason: extensive recidivism among sexual deviants.

[trisham]

actually, in this case she has turned from working in an immoral business and is trying to live a decent life. Why speak against her now? I don’t think you shouldn’t call out someone who has turned away from sin.

****************

Agreed.

[seemoAR]

Would you trust a “reformed” thief to take care of your money and possessions? I wonder if her age was the main reason she retired from her “immoral business”.
Your last sentence confuses me. ;o)

[Man50D]

actually, in this case she has turned from working in an immoral business and is trying to live a decent life. Why speak against her now?

No, this is a case where someone whose past is anathema to family values is in a highly influential position with children where leading by example is paramount. Her past is not the example anyone would want kids to follow and it obviously can't be buried as evident by the situation. She certainly can't explain to kids her past with any justification.

I don’t think you shouldn’t call out someone who has turned away from sin.

The paramount concern is kids being exposed to someone who for years encouraged immoral values and not the adult.