Posted on 11/18/2008 8:36:24 PM PST by rocco55
It's 11/18 at 11:30 PM eastern standard time. Hawaii time is 5 hours behind EST. The links below do not appear to be on Andy Martin's web-site, but appear to be EMERGENCY motions that he filed on 11/17/2008. In these motions, he claims that he was denied access to Mr. Obama's birth cert ! Does this mean that his hearing did not go forward on 11/18/2008 as scheduled, or is this in anticipation of a court denial to access the BC ?
Anyone know ? Let's pray for VICTORY ! Check it out ! Thx !
http://contrariancommentary.wordpress.com/2008/10/18/andy-martin-hawaii-lawsuit-2-emergency-motion/
Also see
http://contrariancommentary.wordpress.com/2008/10/18/andy-martin-hawaii-lawsuit-1-complaint/
That’s ridiculous. I would hope that, at least until I’m dead, no one can see or get a copy of my BC without my consent. Glad I left CA in the 80’s and moved to TX. Maybe in a few years we’ll secede. Maybe CA will wish they had.
Site has been updated. Follow this link to the link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2134526/posts
True, except he technically has not been elected yet. He isn't elected until the elector votes are counted and certified by the Senate. That isn't done until December.
Here’s an email I received from Martin this AM. He seems upbeat:
(HONOLULU)(November 18, 2008) Aloha from Hawai’i.
A Honolulu circuit judge heard vigorous arguments in the lawsuit filed by Obama author Andy Martin. Martin is seeking access to Barack Obama’s original, typewritten 1961 birth certificate. The judge reserved judgment.
“We had about a half-hour hearing,” Martin states. “Both the Attorney General and I vigorously presented our respective positions. The Court gave no indication of when or how the ruling could come or what the result will be.
“I have ordered a transcript of the hearing and as soon as it arrives we will post it on our blogs. People should be able to read the arguments in Court. Rather than characterize what was said, I will allow everyone to review the presentation for themselves.
In any case, 'raving lunatic' is used by too lightly by folks who never had to deal with one.
You need a good reading comprehension course.
You didn’t read my remarks in context. I was responding to another poster’s remark (contained in my reply), “Anyone who puts any stock in this clown is a fool.”
I used a hyperbolic phrase in my remark to make a point, not to describe anyone, Andy Martin in particular.
I’ve been corresponding with Martin for over a year and would never describe him, or anyone else, a “raving lunatic.” Shameless self-promoter, maybe.
And, I have experience with a complete raving lunatic up close and very personal, not from the safety of a jury room.
And after that particular trial I told the Judge the defendant should have never been brought to trial because he was too insane. But the pre-trial shrink had passed him. The Judge said he'd refer the creep back to the shrinks for a re-evaluation before sentencing.
And, yes, I've dealt with more than one raving psychotic 'up close and personal', not just from the 'safety of a jury box'. YOU jumped to a conclusion that had no basis in fact, just in order to get in a knock. Well, I'm not taking it. Chill. It's cool. We're all here on FR for the general good.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.