Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: valkyry1
The F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter seems to have even more detractors than other aircraft projects have had in the past.

Maybe. I recall stories of VC being able to toss things into the air to cause the F-111 to automatically perform loop-de-loops or some such.

7 posted on 11/09/2008 2:30:53 PM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: decimon

Oh yeah they really lambasted the F111, and then the F18.

For some really hot airplanes that never were, look at all the fighters that were to be developed using the Pratt 4360 radial engine, but got canceled because of the wars end and the jet-engine.


9 posted on 11/09/2008 2:38:14 PM PST by valkyry1 (McCain/Palin 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: decimon
I recall stories of VC being able to toss things into the air to cause the F-111 to automatically perform loop-de-loops or some such.

IIRC, the F-111's Terrain Following Radar's failure mode was to do an abrupt pitch-up maneuver, and apparently it was prone to a lot of false alarms. The pilot had an override switch (called "the paddle," I think) that he could use to override failure mode and apparently 'hitting the paddle' had become automatic reaction to sudden pitch-ups on stateside training flights. Unfortunately, Southeast Asia has lots of karst topography and several F-111s were supposed to have been lost by being flown (on override) into the sides of rock towers.

That failure mode maneuver may be what you're thinking of. The VC's making use of it by 'tossing things in the air' sounds apocryphal, though.

22 posted on 11/09/2008 4:13:38 PM PST by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson