OK. I’m not going to repeat this again.
The “Salman Pak” terrorist training center was a fiction created by a source named “Curveball.” His handlers reported that he was a drunk and shouldn’t trusted. It turns out that he wasn’t even involved in Saddam’s government.
Look, believe whatever fairy tales that you want. In the last five years, all of the prewar intelligence has proven to be false. There were no terrorist training camps. I’m not really interested in debating you on the basis of debunked propaganda. Read something recent.
You’re more of a lib troll than the guy who started this thread.
Were Abu Abbas, Abu Nidal and Abu Zarqawi also fictional characters that Hussein gave sanctuary to?
Or doesn't it bother you when governments give sanctuary to terrorists who murdered your fellow Americans?
So the sat imagery was faked?
The terrorist training caps that our soldiers walked through weren’t there?
Wow, you’re heavily drinking coolaid.
Source? Links? The source known as "Curveball" certainly did not create the claims about "Salman Pak" as a terrorist training center, for those claims long pre-date the emergence of "Curveball" as a source. What "Curveball" was mainly assoicated with was the supposed intel on mobile bio weapons labs. I have never seen a reference to "Curveball" even discussing Salman Pak and terrorist training there, although of course it is possible that he picked it up from reports that have been all over the Internet and in articles, books etc. since the mid-90s.
As a fabricating source he may have tried to make use of "reports" that were already out there, but I recall reading such reports long before "Curveball" even became a source, however bad, talking to German intel.
Anyway, you are certainly wrong to ascribe the origin of all reports of terrorist training at Salman Pak to the "Curveball" character.
From a cursory web search just now I find that the only places making such assertions are far-left crap sites. Surely you are not relying upon those places for your "facts"??