Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: FreeLuna

I appreciate your points and think they are pretty solid.

I think a lot of people confuse my defense of President Bush with a lack of desire for more conservatism. I would like to have a more conservative President. I would also like to win elections.

Bush winning two elections did accomplish a huge relative advantage for conservatives. His soft conservatism was better than hard liberalism. I would love for conservatives to figure it out and win with some other candidates.

Most of the sniping at President Bush strikes me [not yours] as counterproductive and undermining the emergence of a conservative voice. I think if a conservative candidate had lead the ticket this fall I think Bush would have again graciously allowed the Republican to use him like a punching bag and say that we need a “real conservative” in the White House. What kind of person has that kind of gracious character?

He has been tough as nails on America’s true enemies: Al Qaeda, Saddam, islamic radicalism. And yet he is so gracious to his domestic back stabbers at home. I really doubt Obama will pull that off.


52 posted on 11/05/2008 11:03:01 AM PST by lonestar67 (Its time to withdraw from the War on Bush-- your side is hopelessly lost in a quagmire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: lonestar67
He has been tough as nails on America’s true enemies

Bogus.

The Chi-Coms and Russia under the Putin-KGB are a far, far, far, far bigger threat.

The United States is the most successful country in the world today. Only after we have learned all of its useful experiences can we replace it in the future. Even though we are presently imitating the American tone “China and United States rely on each other and share honor and disgrace,” we must not forget that the history of our civilization repeatedly has taught us that one mountain does not allow two tigers to live together. We also must never forget what Comrade Xiaoping emphasized “refrain from revealing the ambitions and put others off the track.” The hidden message is: we must put up with America; we must conceal our ultimate goals, hide our capabilities and await the opportunity. In this way, our mind is clear. Why have we not updated our national anthem with something peaceful? Why did we not change the anthem’s theme of war? Instead, when revising the Constitution this time, for the first time we clearly specified “March of the Volunteers” is our national anthem. Thus we will understand why we constantly talk loudly about the “Taiwan issue” but not the “American issue.” We all know the principle of “doing one thing under the cover of another.” If ordinary people can only see the small island of Taiwan in their eyes, then you as the elite of our country should be able to see the whole picture of our cause. Over these years, according to Comrade Xiaoping’s arrangement, a large piece of our territory in the North has been given up to Russia; do you really think our Party Central Committee is a fool? To resolve the issue of America we must be able to transcend conventions and restrictions. In history, when a country defeated another country or occupied another country, it could not kill all the people in the conquered land, because back then you could not kill people effectively with sabers or long spears, or even with rifles or machine guns. Therefore, it was impossible to gain a stretch of land without keeping the people on that land. However, if we conquered America in this fashion, we would not be able to make many people migrate there. Only by using special means to “clean up” America will we be able to lead the Chinese people there. This is the only choice left for us. This is not a matter of whether we are willing to do it or not. What kind of special means is there available for us to “clean up” America? Conventional weapons such as fighters, canons, missiles and battleships won’t do; neither will highly destructive weapons such as nuclear weapons. We are not as foolish as to want to perish together with America by using nuclear weapons, despite the fact that we have been exclaiming that we will have the Taiwan issue resolved at whatever cost. Only by using non-destructive weapons that can kill many people will we be able to reserve America for ourselves. There has been rapid development of modern biological technology, and new bio weapons have been invented one after another. Of course we have not been idle; in the past years we have seized the opportunity to master weapons of this kind. We are capable of achieving our purpose of “cleaning up” America all of a sudden. When Comrade Xiaoping was still with us, the Party Central Committee had the perspicacity to make the right decision not to develop aircraft carrier groups and focus instead on developing lethal weapons that can eliminate mass populations of the enemy country. From a humanitarian perspective, we should issue a warning to the American people and persuade them to leave America and leave the land they have lived in to the Chinese people. Or at least they should leave half of the United States to be China’s colony, because America was first discovered by the Chinese.

He has been their lap-dog. Both of them. From the outset.

And need we mention Iran? He has explicitly not only kept us from doing what needs doing...but kept Israel from doing anything either. His hyper-liberal State Dept. runs the show. They are de facto running the White House.

54 posted on 11/05/2008 12:00:35 PM PST by Paul Ross (Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson