Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: OneWingedShark
You took one look, got huffy over a political difference and then whined and cried over its age!?

No, I did take the time to read most of several chapters, although the Reagan reference was flippant. The C++ stuff was so obviously out of date (eg pre-STL), that I went and checked the t copyright date. So, as a technicaly guide, its almost useless, although I suppose that as a historical reference, there is some value there.

Your code example is more a C issue than a C++ one.

41 posted on 11/01/2008 6:34:06 PM PDT by TiberiusClaudius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: TiberiusClaudius

Ok, how about C++’s [lack] of inheritance.

There’s no constructor inheritance!
Also, the private/protected/public access specifiers are implemented in a more “source-code”-al way instead of on the conceptual level.
And the way in which it handles inheritance is disgusting, more like defining some interface than actually inheriting something.


46 posted on 11/13/2008 11:49:01 AM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson