Replies

It could be fun to speculate on what triggers the delusion.

. . . the delusion that some perspectives are evidently construed by those holding them . . .

. . . to be worth more than the tissue wiping the standard indiscreet and usually quite uncomfortable probe . . .

Alas, the best guess is the usual outrageous arrogance fostered by gross insecurity fostered by a terminal degree of REACTIVE ATTACHMENT DISORDER in their early years.

Though I suppose chronic and persistently galactic levels of cluelessness could arise from being genetically out of their depth.

Or maybe a genetically altered wasp stung them in their egos triggering a very troubling cell division gone wild in key synapse centers.

Or maybe some sort of strange contamination occurred from an unfortunate series of falls face down in slug slime from slugs from some secret biological nuke experiments. I hear that stuff can take over sinuses horrifically . . . and progress rapidly and voraciously from there.

Some cowboys insist that a similar delusion seems to arise from greenhorns arrogantly running and jumping on their horses without being sufficiently careful to remove some very tough and sharp pine cones first. I’m not quite clear about that one but it supposedly has something to do with resulting pains capturing so much brain processing time and resources that coherent thought is not a frequent event for a good deal of time taken for healing.

Then there’s the allegation that some ET’s keep a stable of frequently visited naysayers quite stocked up in their blood levels of a perverse hallucinogenic that convinces the hapless victims that THEY are uniquely in possession of the sacred secrets of the hidden structure of reality. I hear it’s basically a huge galactic put-on for the amusement of the ET’s watching the hapless humans make persistent fools of themselves. Kind of like some Chinese merchants feigning ignorance of English and good sense all the while taking the hapless customer to the cleaners price-wise . . . Then guffawing to the max with all the relatives in the back room.

God alone knows, the truth, of course.

It is occasionally amusing to see them dance their compulsive dances bouncing to and fro upside down on their pointed heads.

From: http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread366796/pg1 Source: http://www.relativitychallenge.com/approach.htm posted on 27/6/2008 @ 05:09 single this post "quote"REPLY TO: Scientists Challenge Einstein's Theory! Faster Than Light Travel Possible! In 1905, Einstein established the Theory of Special Relativity that has defined space and time for a century. Scientists and researchers have been unable to definitively find anything wrong with it. Now they have! One scientist has even pointed that quotations from the 1905 document and Einstein’s contemporaries as well as interpretations of the Relativity equations clearly and concisely describe a confused and obviously erroneous theory. Every year millions of students are taught this theory without a critical analysis of Relativity. So what exactly is this theory of Special Relativity? And what is the confusion all about? For starters, the special theory of relativity, deals with the relative motions of objects and describes the motion of particles moving at close to the speed of light. Theoretical Basis for Special Relativity Einstein's theory of special relativity results from two statements -- the two basic postulates of special relativity: > The speed of light is the same for all observers, no matter what their relative speeds. It will be seen to be the same relative to any observer, independent of the motion of the observer -- is the crucial idea that led Einstein to formulate his theory. It means we can define a quantity c, the speed of light, which is a fundamental constant of nature. > The laws of physics are the same in any inertial (that is, non-accelerated) frame of reference. This means that the laws of physics observed by a hypothetical observer traveling with a relativistic particle must be the same as those observed by an observer who is stationary in the laboratory. Peculiar Relativistic Effects • Time dilation – the time lapse between two events does not vary from one observer to another, but is dependent on the relative speeds of the observers' reference frames. For e.g., the twin paradox, where a twin who in a spaceship traveling near the speed of light, returns to find his sibling has aged much more. • Relativity of simultaneity – two events happening in two different locations that occur simultaneously to one observer, may occur at different times to another observer. • Lorentz contraction – the dimensions of an object as measured by one observer may be smaller than the results of measurements of the same object made by another observer. • Composition of velocities – velocities (and speeds) do not simply 'add', for example if a rocket is moving at ⅔ the speed of light relative to an observer, and the rocket fires a bullet at ⅔ of the speed of light relative to the rocket, the bullet does not exceed the speed of light relative to the observer. • Inertia and momentum – as an object's speed approaches the speed of light from an observer's point of view, its mass appears to increase thereby making it more and more difficult to accelerate it from within the observer's frame of reference. • Equivalence of mass and energy, E = mc2 – The energy content of an object at rest with mass m equals mc2. Special relativity reveals that c is not just the velocity of a certain phenomenon, namely the propagation of electromagnetic radiation (light)—but rather a fundamental feature of the way space and time are unified as spacetime. A consequence of this is that it is impossible for any particle that has mass to be accelerated to the speed of light. Fallacy Of The Theory Of Special Relativity Having said that, take a look at the fallacy of the above effects. The diagram shows the approach to the CICS. Click on the link below to view the details in each box: The Relativity Challenge. . . . continued at source and ATS thread