Replies

“Can people who realize O is using these techniques be influenced by the techniques?”

I think it’s better to know what he is doing.

I saw him give a strong suggestion today.

Obama appeared and danced on the Ellen DeGeneres’ Show, where he made the comment:

‘Michelle may be a better dancer, but I am convinced I am a better dancer than John McCain,’

Why would Obama say this in view of the fact that — because of McCain’s war disabilities and age — almost EVERYONE is a better dancer than McCain is?

He most certainly was NOT joking when he made this statement (with an angry face and a finger in the air!)

And why would ANYONE say something so off the wall? (he also used a stern authoritarian voice )

The answer is Obama wanted to deliver a subliminal message

Here is how Obama said it from an NLP perspective:

‘Michelle MAY be a better dancer (Pace: of course she MAY be a better dancer than he) but I am convinced (Obama’s FINGER points UPWARD as he makes a STERN face ) I am a better dancer than John McCain (the lead)

Note: When Obama points UP as he says ‘I’ he is identifying himself with God (the man upstairs as we say) making the impact of himself as an authority even MORE powerful(subconsciously)than ordinary finger wagging.

At face it seems that he is stating the obvious, namely, that he is a better dancer than McCain.

Of course he is a better dancer!

But why would he have to be ‘convinced’ — or anyone else — that he is a better dancer?

He would not… nor would WE!

The embedded message in our subconscious is:

I am convinced that Obama is BETTER THAN JOHN McCAIN (’dancer is deleted.)

It was strange seeing this short snippet on the news and realizing that I was one of the few people realizing what this guy was doing and how easily he can deceive the unwary using the science of NLP.

STE=Q