Posted on 10/15/2008 10:34:12 AM PDT by Niuhuru
A lot of freepers pretty much compare Obama with Hitler the same way the Libs think Bush is like Hitler.
It just popped into my head and I wanted to get it down before I forget.
When Hitler was a young kid, he supposedly had a Jewish relative, supposedly his father who was a Jewish businessman who his mother had an affair with while she worked as a maid.
Hitler shrouded it while he was running for Furher and after he gained power he trivilized it or simply ignored it, due to his self loathing.
Barack is the same way. Ever since he began his campaign he has trivialized his mother's side of his family and emphasizeed his blackness. He has surrounded himself, like Hitler's anti-semetic thugs, with blacks who hate whites with visceral loathing that will without a doubt turn genocidal if Obama is elected.
Like Obama, Hitler wasn't initially intimidating and seemed to be strong and a refreshing, young and vigorous change. People were crazy about him and he was a war veteran and decorated, he didn't seem thuggish or a bully (to my knowledge). By himself he would have been a charismatic, if entirely anti-climactic leader.
However, it was his self loathing of his Jewish lineage, and a lack of being a part of society. He was alienated and during the chaos of the post-WWI years found others like him, disillusioned with the mainstream and the government. Mainstream government and society seemed incapable of dealing with the problems and needed strong decisive leadership which was lacking.
Hitler then jumped into the fray, built a strong base of supporters who thought exactly like him and didn't just talk and exchange ideas, they turned themselves into a unit of thugs and former army members and sought out the finest and most ruthless minds.
After the failed pustch he was in jail and wrote his memoirs which didn't so much describe his life so much as his ideas of a perfect society and racial purity. Obama is remarkably similar with his memoirs and how he shies away from describing in detail his background and instead concentrates on his doctrine and ideas of how society should be run based on principles not so much based on racial purity, but on how a 'just' and 'fair' country could be built. That blacks such as himself and his circle would run everything pretty much goes unmentioned as something that should be taken for granted.
Like Hitler in regards to his Jewishness, Obama has a strong streak of self loathing towards his white lineage and an unexpressed determination to prove himeslf as unstintingly black. To prove it, he has surrounded himself with the worst of black militants and other outcasts, racial and social. He has his strong arm group the black panthers, members of the media, and also a tight knit group of hard core loyalists who will do anything to take back what didn't belong to them in the first place.
Unlike the religious doctrine that spurred the Nazis on, it'll be about the racial doctrine that has been poisoning blacks since the sixties and seventies. Not about killing Christ, but about slavery. Slavery is the "killed Christ" of the modern age with whites in the role of "Evil Jews."
Of course in the end, the Jews are always on the list. I hoep they remember that.
Then you can show me Clinton's Logo, or Reagan's...
“Wrong. Hitler had Ernst Rohm’s stormtroopers in the streets intimidating and cracking heads during the two elections. He wrote Mein Kampf years before taking power in Germany. He was indeed a genocidal madman from the outset. “
Wow, that sounds currently familiar.
I can't find McCain's logo. For that matter, I can't recall Dole's or Kerry's or Gore's either.
Obama is the head of the International Socialist movement here in America.
So ... if that makes him not another Hitler ..
It does make him another Lenin, another Stalin, another Mao.
Lenin, Stalin, and Mao did more damage to the world than Hitler.
> After the failed pustch he (Hitler) was in jail and wrote his memoirs which didn’t so much describe his life so much as his ideas of a perfect society and ...
Does this mean that Barry will be jailed for trying to hide his birth certificate?
Other posts were missing the point as was the thread by comparing the useless stuff.
Obama’s core beliefs are the very same as those held by some of the most ruthless leaders in world history.
And considering his stance on infantiscide he may in the end be even worse
God save the republic.
Bush must've been Hitler too.
I fail to see how these are fundamentally different from Obama's logo. No doubt the mimicking of the Presidential Seal was presumptuous -- but, all campaigns use logos for advertising purposes. I don't see an "O" as being particularly different from a "W".
And, even if it is COMPLETELY different ... still doesn't make him Hitler.
H
I don’t know. At this point a miracle will be needed to prevent Obama from getting elected.
If he is sent to jail, I think riots will look like bonfires compared to what his supporters will do to this country in retaliation.
Those are bumper stickers, not logos.
What makes Obama's logo so different that he's comparable to Hitler? Its just an "O" with a few stripes.
H
No — they’re logos. Particularly the “W”.
H
I fail to see why an “O” with a few stripes is Hitlerian propaganda, but a “W” with an attached flag (with stripes) is not.
A logo is simply an advertising method, and is certainly not inherently evil — even when used for political purposes. McDonald’s uses a logo. BMW uses a logo. The United States uses dozens of symbols and logos. George W. Bush used logos. The Military uses logos.
So Hitler and Obama both use logos. So what? Lots of people and groups use logos, and few of them have anything else in common with Hitler.
This discussion is asinine.
H
I wasn't aware anyone said it was.
So Hitler and Obama both use logos. So what? Lots of people and groups use logos, and few of them have anything else in common with Hitler.
Where was it stated that the use of a logo makes one comparable to Hitler? The original point was that the use of a logo by a political movement is one common feature of the campaigns of Hitler and Obama (and Lenin for that matter).
This discussion is asinine.
You should not have dragged it down to that level.
>> Where was it stated that the use of a logo makes one comparable to Hitler?
Post 3.
>> The original point was that the use of a logo by a political movement is one common feature of the campaigns of Hitler and Obama (and Lenin for that matter).
And George W. Bush. Again ... so what? Why is that a useful “original point”? Seems to me its more of a random observation with no usable conclusion.
>>> This discussion is asinine.
>> You should not have dragged it down to that level.
I’m not the one that compared Obama to Hitler because both use a logo.
H
I cannot help you, I have no formal training in remedial education.
I’m not the one that compared Obama to Hitler because both use a logo.
Again though, that misstates the original point. I can't tell if you're doing that on purpose or if you really just don't get it.
>> I cannot help you, I have no formal training in remedial education.
Doctorate in condescension?
>> Again though, that misstates the original point. I can’t tell if you’re doing that on purpose or if you really just don’t get it.
The original point was that both Obama and Hitler have logos ... I fail to see what conclusion I should draw from that useless observation.
H
As I said, I have no training in remedial education. Condescending? Only with those foolish posts so far beneath me.
>> As I said, I have no training in remedial education.
So you don’t know the answer to the question as to what purpose that random observation served. Nice.
>> Condescending? Only with those foolish posts so far beneath me.
Sorry to waste your time, professor.
H
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.