“There were a few problems, but mostly her answers were too pat, generic and rambling. Plus she said a few things (like the Constitutional role of the VP) that will probably come back to haunt her. As for Biden, sounded a lot more focused, authoritative and articulate.”
Not sure what debate you watch and I REALLY question your motives.
Yeah, whatever. I've been a FReeper for a LOOONG time. You can look at my posts and I'm as conservative as they get. And part of my conservatism is giving my honest opinion. I'll still be voting for McCain regardless.
“Not sure what debate you watch and I REALLY question your motives.”
Question mine too then.
Her answers contained a lot of repetitive generic statements, and sometimes she caused me to either lose interest, or wonder what question she was responding to.
Biden was more direct, especially in the latter half, and got to his point with less extraneous verbiage.
So, depends on whether you give weight to presentation, or validity.
Sarah had more valid and proveable points.
Joe was more effective in presentation.
I think the general public (especially the sheeple) will think Joe won.
I think Joe might even make a wonderful VP. However, There’s no way in hell it should be with Obama as President.
Now 2012 Palin/Biden wouldn’t be too bad. Talk about bi-partisanship.