Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I told you so
Vanity | 29 September 2008 | JasonC

Posted on 09/29/2008 4:16:58 PM PDT by JasonC

I told you so.

Happy?

Think you saved anybody lots of money?

Think you reduced the role of government?

On saving money, US markets dropped $1.2 trillion today, and worldwide it was more like $3.5 trillion.

On the role of government, the Fed announced $630 billion in new central bank credits today, half of it to central banks abroad. And oh, the FDIC guaranteed to Citigroup all losses beyond the first 13% on Wachovia's mortgage book, which is around $300 billion.

And it won't be remotely enough, and will probably need to be doubled tomorrow.

When are you going to learn that you are in the same boat with those you are throwing brickbats at, that you are their creditors and end owners, and that destroying as many as you like will not avert one dime of the hit, but just multiply it tenfold and drop it right back in your own lap?

How many times does this have to blow up in your face in succession, before you admit the possibility that others might actually know something about it, and you might actually be wrong?


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: crapsandwich; needsmorecowbell; soreloserman; turnpaper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-252 next last
To: itsPatAmerican

And you think that those companies would have no strings to the government after a bailout?


21 posted on 09/29/2008 4:24:42 PM PDT by proudtobeanamerican1 (God Bless Sarah Palin and her Family.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: itsPatAmerican

And you think that those companies would have no strings to the government after a bailout?


22 posted on 09/29/2008 4:24:45 PM PDT by proudtobeanamerican1 (God Bless Sarah Palin and her Family.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool
I wish I’d invested in Self-Serving Free Republic Vanities two weeks ago. I’d be a trillionaire.

Okay...that was funny.

23 posted on 09/29/2008 4:24:55 PM PDT by BookmanTheJanitor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

The poster isn’t having a fit he is simply trying to figure out will happen without the bailout. My initial reaction was a ‘ no ‘ to the bailout but then what happens without it? I’ve heard so many different opinions I’m lost at this point.


24 posted on 09/29/2008 4:25:08 PM PDT by warsaw44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

To: StrictTime
I will always say no to socialism.

Well, me too. Though under President Obama it isn't going to matter much what we think, or say, or do.

26 posted on 09/29/2008 4:25:48 PM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: itsPatAmerican

I thought the AIG bailout was a bad idea, too. But this vanity wasn’t about that.


27 posted on 09/29/2008 4:26:15 PM PDT by StrictTime (I used to be disgusted, now I try to be amused.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JasonC
On saving money, US markets dropped $1.2 trillion today, and worldwide it was more like $3.5 trillion.

Crap. Now we'll never catch up.

28 posted on 09/29/2008 4:26:31 PM PDT by Stentor (Obama is Bill Ayers' Renfield.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proudtobeanamerican1
If your policies were continued, there wouldn't be any market to work itself out in a matter of a few months. But they will not be. You will then take credit for a robustness that is entirely due to the existence and effectiveness of policies you oppose. Ideologues never face reality, they just wait for other men to change it, and then so "oh look there, something good happened, see, I was responsible for that because I think so well of myself." Meanwhile the actual direct consequences of their actions are visible to all but the blind, and reek to high heaven.
29 posted on 09/29/2008 4:26:51 PM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JasonC

So adding 700 billion more approved by the same crooks that screwed over the mortgage industry is good in what way? Or should i just read up on Pelosi’s magnificent defense of more socialism?


30 posted on 09/29/2008 4:27:36 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JasonC

Net mortgage issuance in calendar 2005 was $1.1 trillion. Net mortgage issuance in the 2nd quarter of this year, annual rate, was $80 billion.

Comparing a psychotically frenzied housing boom to the hangover which it quite rightly produced.

Might as well compare total dotcom IPO's in January 1999 to January 2001.

31 posted on 09/29/2008 4:27:52 PM PDT by Notary Sojac (I'll back the bailout if Angelo Mozilo lets me borrow his Lamborghini on Saturday nights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: StrictTime

It goes all the way back to the Chrysler Bailout, it set the precedent.


32 posted on 09/29/2008 4:28:14 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: DLfromthedesert
Since it was too high, yes that is constructive. All prices declining by a factor of 5 or 10 - wages included - no, that wouldn't count as a "silver lining". Just as a huge net transfer to holders of nominal claims, from every actual producer. If the Fed did nothing right now, that is what would immediately happen. But thankfully it is insulated from the nabobs here, and it will do what you will not.
33 posted on 09/29/2008 4:29:20 PM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool

Or would that be Trollionaire...


34 posted on 09/29/2008 4:29:44 PM PDT by Xenophon450
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: StrictTime
I thought the AIG bailout was a bad idea, too. But this vanity wasn’t about that.

I just think in general we are making a bigger deal about the bailout than AIG, but AIG is the much more slippery slope. We nationalized a company. That's socialism. $700B is bigger than $85B, but in principle we should be up in arms over AIG.
35 posted on 09/29/2008 4:29:46 PM PDT by itsPatAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: gost2

So I drown with my integrity intact. I’d drown anyway, right? If I was adrift without a boat in the middle of the Atlantic? If the “boat” you are suggesting in your metaphor is this tax-payer rape called a “bailout”, it’s made of nothing but straw and will sink eventually.


36 posted on 09/29/2008 4:29:46 PM PDT by StrictTime (I used to be disgusted, now I try to be amused.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JasonC

I won’t believe there’s a depression until I hear about people jumping out of windows along Wall St. and the survivors selling apples on the streets of NYC.

Experiences such as those caused people in my parents’ generation to value their jobs and their money. We have become very soft and very lethargic about watching what politicians have been doing to the US dollar the past 50 years.


37 posted on 09/29/2008 4:30:08 PM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor29
If the ‘value’ of these stocks and other assets is legit, the money will come back to them in short order. And if the value is actually phony and inflated (which it is) then it’s proper economics for those assets to go to their proper valuations. Those who are so flustered by the DOW going down or their phony real estate equity disappearing are simply beneficiaries of a phony run-up, and you want the rest of the country to dig deep so as to keep your phony assets propped up. Sorry if I don’t really care.

After the drop today I checked my accounts. I 'lost' about 6.5% on my investments. Except I am still ahead about 80% from the actual purchase prices and reinvested dividends. That is over a period of 10 years. So you are absolutely correct the values are inflated. Am I happy the values dropped? no. Am I happy that I still have enough left in the investments to allow me to go on crusies? yes. Will I be unhappy if they drop down to a ROI of about 4 or 5%. yes. But I still have enough to stay retired on. So I agree with you. I dont' really care if the market loses more of the phony asset runup.

38 posted on 09/29/2008 4:30:23 PM PDT by ProudFossil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JasonC

You forgot to capitalize random words in your post. In case you were not aware, capitalization is the key to making your arguments both compelling and cogent.


39 posted on 09/29/2008 4:30:23 PM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JasonC

Your assumption is that the 700 billion bailout would have ended the problems, and more money would not have to be thrown at the problem.


40 posted on 09/29/2008 4:30:44 PM PDT by Dawn531
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-252 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson