I can tell you that I’m newly registered to vote in Florida and will be voting for McCain. Whatever that’s worth.
I wonder how many are in the ground, illegal, or duplicates?
The change in registration will show in all polling. Polling phone calls are not restricted to old registration lists. They are random. The respondent says if he or she is registered.
So this talk of new registrations either has an effect or not in a way that will be understood from the polls before election day.
Must be the end of the world. A lot of people being raised from the dead.
It’s one thing to register young & new voters. It’s a whole nother thing to see them showing up to vote.
There are almost 2 million more Democrats than Republicans in Florida if I’m not mistaken and despite that we’ve had 2 Jeb Bush terms and 1 Crist term.
I heard something about this today on Fox, and they were saying that if that is the case Obama should be way ahead in the polls and also in the primaries and that Kerry should have won when he ran too because they had registered a huge amount of dems back then as well.
My question is how many of the new registered voters are real and how many are ACORN?
Republican Party affiliation increased 2 percent in August.
Numbers don't always add up the way the dimrats think they will......Pennsylvainia is loaded with Seasoned citizens that I'm betting won't vote for a Black Yewth.
We have WORK to do people. Let’s get out there and DO IT!
operation chaos figures are included in pa ,ohio,id,nc,va,
Relax. 40 to 50% of the electorate will not show up to vote.
The voter turnout going back to 76 years: 1932, 52%; 1936, 57%; 1940, 59%; 1944, 56%; 1948, 51% ; 1952, 62%; 1956, 59%; 1960, 63; 1964, 62%; 1968, 61%; 1972, 55%; 1976, 54% ; 1980, 53%; 1984, 53%; 1988, 50%; 1992, 54%; *1996, 49%; 2000, 51%; 2004, 55%.
Most of these new voting yahoos will be hitting the bong on election day.
*Note: notice Clinton won with less than 50% of the electorate not voting in 1996.
How do they know who is legal
A 17% increase in voting in PA? Sounds statistically unfathomable, considering that it’s a “Rust Belt” state, growing in population - if at all - at a rate less than the national average. I’d have to agree that there is likely some degree of fraud involved, especially when you consider the ‘Rats’ tradition of such activities.