To: ThomasThomas
451 posted on Friday, October 03, 2008 4:20:26 PM by Monkey Face (I'm out of my mind. Be back in five minutes.)
458 posted on Friday, October 03, 2008 4:53:28 PM by Monkey Face (I'm out of my mind. Be back in five minutes.) I dunno. To me it looks like a monostable multivibrator with a fixed "active" duration before relapse into the steady state -- a.k.a. "one-shot." But that's just an engineering take on the matter...
466 posted on
10/03/2008 5:17:00 PM PDT by
sionnsar
(Obama?Bye-den!|Iran Azadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY)| Seattle:ugly city in pretty locale)
To: sionnsar
Cyclic inversion of variostats, definitely.
471 posted on
10/03/2008 5:26:05 PM PDT by
Darksheare
("IT stunes the beeber and changes it's tagline or it gets the Zot again.")
To: sionnsar; ThomasThomas; Monkey Face; Tax-chick; Gabz
I dunno. To me it looks like a monostable multivibrator with a fixed “active” duration before relapse into the steady state — a.k.a. “one-shot.” But that's just an engineering take on the matter... “I”, certainly, would have “many” reservations and vibrations about openly discussing “any” lady's rapid switching of multi-functional active vibrations before her steady state relapses from ANY climatic state into a relaxed mode of one-shot engineering..... At least in pubic. (Er, publick.)
Butt them again, "I" am a swerve and deboner kind o' guy, "never" one to ferment devise grips where they are not kneaded.
495 posted on
10/03/2008 6:45:12 PM PDT by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson