Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michelle Malkin: Sarah Palin’s private e-mail hacked, family photos raided
http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/17/sarah-palins-private-e-mail-hacked-family-photos-raided/

Posted on 09/17/2008 1:47:32 PM PDT by AUJenn

Sometime early this morning, between approximately 3:00am - 4:00am, members of an infamous group of hackers broke into Gov. Sarah Palin’s private Yahoo e-mail account. The incriminating discussion threads included screenshots of Palin’s e-mail and private e-mail addresses of her contacts. The threads have since been deleted.

Hacking e-mail is a federal crime. A TV anchor who broke into his colleague’s e-mail account recently pleaded guilty and faces a maximum five years in prison.

The law will catch up to the hackers, but what about the lowlifes who are now gleefully splashing the alleged contents of Palin’s private e-mail account all over the Internet?

The Gawker smear machine — see here for all the background you need — has posted private family photos of Palin’s children that were apparently stolen from the e-mail account.

They have used Bristol Palin’s illegally obtained private cell phone number from her mom’s private account, recorded her voicemail message, and posted it on their website.

They have reprinted her husband Todd’s private e-mail address and son Track’s private e-mail address.

You think this is just a harmless prank? Those of you who have had to deal with break-ins and identity theft know exactly what a burdensome process it is to recover from crimes like this.

Gawker knowingly and deliberately published illegally obtained photos of the Palin children.

Where are the privacy absolutists now?

You think Palin Derangement Syndrome is bad now? These by-any-means-necessary lunatics are just warming up.

Let me repeat what I said about Nick Denton and his slime businesses in 2006. It’s every bit as relevant now. And I expect the same cowards who said nothing then to remain silent about the violations of the Palin family’s privacy now:


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Computers/Internet; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: breakin; corruptdems; cultureofcorruption; democratscandals; dncbrownshirts; doj; fbi; hackers; howtostealanelection; identitytheft; malkin; mccainpalin; palin; sarahpalin; stalinisttactics; ussa; watergate2; yahoo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: OldMissileer
I'm guessing that the Secret Service will be pretty interested in this case.

Somewhere, there's a 19-year-old kid, sitting in his Mom's basement surrounded by pizza boxes, that's going to to have a very, very bad day soon.

21 posted on 09/17/2008 2:15:50 PM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
Being that Gov. Palin is not the owner of the server that was violated she is not the victim of a crime.

I disagree. Yes, they 'broke' into the Yahoo server, but what they took was Palin's private coorespondence so they are both victims. Beyond that, it is a felony. It really does not matter who the victim is or what the victim thinks.

22 posted on 09/17/2008 2:16:20 PM PDT by Ditto (Global Warming: The 21st Century's Snake Oil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
Instead, Yahoo is that one that is the victim and they should pursue charges against the hackers.

Isn't that like saying that the victim of a wire tap is the phone company?

Watergate Burglars

I want the perps' mugshots like these famous ones.

23 posted on 09/17/2008 2:16:48 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (The break-in of Gov. Palin's email account is the equivalent of the Watergate break-in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Logical me
Not a chance. You got to remember that this RAT machine, born and bred in Chicago, is powerful. Nothing will happen.

I dunno, this is a very public person's account with secret service protections. I think the world will be crashing down on the people who did this.

This isn't a he said, she said thing, this is a proven hack and easily tracable.

24 posted on 09/17/2008 2:17:16 PM PDT by smith288 (Maverick - Barracuda 08! Http://www.cafepress.com/smith288)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ripley
this will be forgotten because left wingers can do no wrong...

You are correct. Remember Bernadette Dohrn and William Ayers. Blowing up buildings and people, feeling no remorse and saying they didn't do enough. Come January they just might honored guests at the White House.

25 posted on 09/17/2008 2:20:31 PM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

Well, you pay for telephone service while you pay nothing for a Yahoo Account.

Again, obviously, a crime has been committed and in the end charges will be brought.

And at some point Gov. Palin will be asked why she used a Yahoo account to conduct state business.


26 posted on 09/17/2008 2:22:50 PM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
I would never trust Yahoo with my business communication.

I don't trust them with my private communication (which is not hot stuff by any means). I have a Yahoo account, as well as a Hotmail/MSN account. I don't use them; they're strictly for a time where I may not be able to get to my client (doubtful). I don't trust online accounts. Never will. Heck, I don't really trust any accounts...

27 posted on 09/17/2008 2:22:56 PM PDT by bcsco (Sarah America! Ignore the lipstik at your peril!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: bcsco

The only thing I’d trust Yahoo Mail for is as a “throwaway” address for website registrations — that way if some a-hole admin gives the address to spammers, it’s no big deal.


28 posted on 09/17/2008 2:24:30 PM PDT by steve-b (Intelligent design is to evolutionary biology what socialism is to free-market economics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: bcsco

I work for a small company of which I am part owner and if an employee used Yahoo for company communication they would be fired.


29 posted on 09/17/2008 2:26:47 PM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

There are very few sites I’m registered at, and they are all well known sites, and the information I have had to provide is minimal.

Yes, I could use Yahoo and others for this purpose, have thought of it. I just have an aversion to getting too acquainted with them. If I don’t like their politics, I don’t like using them as a portal, for any purpose...


30 posted on 09/17/2008 2:27:23 PM PDT by bcsco (Sarah America! Ignore the lipstik at your peril!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

Good policy. I’m retired so that’s not an issue. But I take few chances when online. I don’t need the hassle, don’t need the aggravation. And I don’t have the temperament :) to put up with much BS...


31 posted on 09/17/2008 2:29:19 PM PDT by bcsco (Sarah America! Ignore the lipstik at your peril!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: AUJenn

Leftists are absolutely amazing... but not in a good way. The double standard is alive and well with the liberals.

What was the excuse (basis) used for Roe v Wade? Privacy.

Privacy has been bantered about by liberals for many years.

Yet direct invasion of someone’s privacy for their own political gain... no problem.

This is so absolutely disgusting.


32 posted on 09/17/2008 2:31:44 PM PDT by TheBattman (A vote for the "lesser evil" is still a vote for evil!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AUJenn

Wow, I went out for a couple of hours to volunteer and all heck breaks loose.

My husband works with a lot of former Secret Service people who did protection details. He is out of town today, but I will get the skinny on what they might do. I do know that the have a cyber-crimes unit.

Just a thought, Obama asked his people to lay off Sarah Palin’s family. It doesn’t say much for his leadership skills when they pull this kind of garbage does it?


33 posted on 09/17/2008 2:31:57 PM PDT by lovesdogs (yw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kimmers

Looks like wikileaks has been taken down.......


34 posted on 09/17/2008 2:52:43 PM PDT by illiac (If we don't change directions soon, we'll get where we're going)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

IMO, your interpretation is limited far more than the actual law itself. Her privacy has been violated and she, and her family members, could have a civil case that might award damages, of they wanted to pursue it.

The break-in, if you would, involves Yahoo, but the dissemination of her Emails and photos and the other information, directly involves her and her family.

So, in a short phrase, you are wrong.


35 posted on 09/17/2008 2:59:00 PM PDT by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AUJenn

These are the same lowlifes who illegally hacked into Michael Steele’s credit reports. Then the two individuals who carried out that operation got “fired” and continued to get paid for several months thereafter (until after the election, I believe.)


36 posted on 09/17/2008 3:02:57 PM PDT by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace

First, there is No Right to Privacy.

However, there is a right to Property and it was Yahoo’s property that was violated. Nonetheless, a crime was committed and the perps should be prosecuted.

Again, I am still not comfortable with a High Ranking Government Official using Yahoo to conduct official state business.


37 posted on 09/17/2008 3:05:23 PM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: lovesdogs

“Obama asked his people to lay off Sarah Palin’s family.”

You don’t seriously think he meant it, do you? It was just rhetoric to make him look good — and his fingers were crossed when he said it.


38 posted on 09/17/2008 3:07:23 PM PDT by MayflowerMadam (Election '08: God is in control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: AUJenn

I have to wonder if Matthew Mosk of the WA Post had anything to do with this?


39 posted on 09/17/2008 3:08:09 PM PDT by Eva (CHANGE- the post modern euphemism for Marxist revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

Not true, hacking in to another person’s private email account is s federal crime. Larry Mendte, former news anchor at KYW-TV in Philadelphia, recently pled guilty to hacking his former co-anchor Alycia Lane’s email. It was not a crime against Yahoo, it was a crime against Lane.


40 posted on 09/17/2008 3:13:49 PM PDT by Dems_R_Losers (RIP Tony Snow, great American, father, and Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson