>> and what “it” are you referring to in the above statement?
“For some “thing” to be said to exist, it must have a definition. That is how we know what “it” is to which we are referring. “Qualia” exists as a concept. Concepts are “things”. “Qualia” has an agreed upon definition.”
OK, now you’re going way off track here. I’m asking you about the grammatical reference to the “it” in that statement you are referring to, in other words the antecdent to the pronoun “it” in that statement of yours.
I am done with your sophistry. I am not anymore interested in discussing what “it” is than I am in people who argue over what the meaning of “is” is.