Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Ricebug

Ah....I don’t think “castle doctrine” would apply in this case..


37 posted on 09/12/2008 12:36:26 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (Fight Crime. Shoot Back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: ButThreeLeftsDo

“Ah....I don’t think “castle doctrine” would apply in this case..”

I believe 15 is under the age of consent here in FL. Assuming that his daughter cannot give consent so he can rightly assume rape. Regardless unless his daughter jumped up and told him the guy was his boyfriend then he is perfectly right in assuming the guy was attacking her.

IMO the kid is lucky he didn’t get shot.

I highly doubt the charges will stick.


41 posted on 09/12/2008 12:45:44 PM PDT by driftdiver (No More Obama - The corruption has not changed despite all our hopes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

“Ah....I don’t think “castle doctrine” would apply in this case..”
In fla, fear of harm for family is all you need to take action. If my home, it’s Sig time.


54 posted on 09/12/2008 1:49:00 PM PDT by Ricebug (NKP RTAFB 70/71)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

“Ah....I don’t think “castle doctrine” would apply in this case..”
In fla, fear of harm for family is all you need to take action. If my home, it’s Sig time.


55 posted on 09/12/2008 1:49:31 PM PDT by Ricebug (NKP RTAFB 70/71)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson