Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: I still care

On the contrary, I think he did quite well.

You have to consider that he is answering for the sake of an uncommitted audience, not us - we are hostile, and we aren’t likely to cut him any slack, but thats not most people.

In a debate he may indeed come off as wishy-washy, pettifogging or untrustworthy, he certainly is capable of that, but I am not convinced he will do that badly.


9 posted on 09/10/2008 5:38:39 PM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: buwaya

Pettifogging. Nice one, I learned a new word.


15 posted on 09/10/2008 6:45:50 PM PDT by Yogafist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: buwaya

He was “thoughtful”. Granted, I’m biased. But he just thought too much. When someone says, you are dealing with a terrorist, you should have a brusque, short answer. You shouldn’t have to think about “how to phrase it”.

I was surprised, but Dick Morris picked up the same theme tonight. He thinks the interviews damaged Obama, showed him as weak. “He thought too much”.

He also said he had always though Obama would win the debates, but after seeing the interview, he thinks McCain will win. Obama just can’t give a straight answer.


22 posted on 09/10/2008 8:48:17 PM PDT by I still care (A thousand screaming Germans, some fake columns and swooning girly-men does not a campaign make.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson