Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Gilbo_3

I haven’t tried any 00 ‘tactical’, but simple physics tells me that less recoil (attributed solely to the ammo load, not the gun design) indicates less energy put to the target. This effect decreases as distance increases, but at typical defensive shotgun distances I want the most energy on the target.


65 posted on 09/10/2008 7:06:01 AM PDT by P8riot (I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: P8riot
I haven’t tried any 00 ‘tactical’, but simple physics tells me that less recoil (attributed solely to the ammo load, not the gun design) indicates less energy put to the target. This effect decreases as distance increases, but at typical defensive shotgun distances I want the most energy on the target.

Not necessarily. Remember that more power in a shotgun shell can also mean more muzzle flash at night, as well as the possibility of larger or *blown center* [doughnut-shaped ring] patterns with less than full coverage of an intended target. Lower recoil buckshot and slug loads may be easier on the gun as well, and the lesser recoil can allower shorter recovery time from recoil, allowing a faster shot on a second or third target, or a quicker second follow-up shot on a deserving initial target.

That's not at all to say that the lower recoil rounds are always or should often be the first choice for every shooter, in every shotgun. But they're certainly worth consideration, particularly if they happen to pattern well or better in your partiucular gun.

71 posted on 09/10/2008 8:03:47 AM PDT by archy (Et Thybrim multo spumantem sanguine cerno. [from Virgil's *Aeneid*.])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson