Take women out of the equation and you're left with sex obsessed men.
This was an excellent article and I admire this man for his tenacity in extricating himself from the “insane asylum.”
One thing he didn’t mention in discussing how lame and illogical and naive it is to believe that “marriage,” for example, will lead to happy, monogamous homosexual couples is the fact that still today most homosexual sexual activity occurs between strangers and in PUBLIC PLACES. Yes, beaches, rest stops, library bathrooms, parks, train stations, you name it.
Most heterosexuals can’t even name one person who regularly engages in sexual activity with strangers in PUBLIC PLACES.
Even heterosexual prostitutes mostly “get a room.”
So what’s the meaning of this? That homosexual sexual activity is, as the author points out, completely and only genital-focused. Ultimately, it has ZERO to do with the individual attached to the genitals. If homosexuals barely feel motivated to “get a room” for most of their sexual activity, why would they suddenly be transformed by having a “marital home”? Homosexual sex is an impersonal act that does not require even a facade of personal privacy or even a modicum of physical comfort (such as heterosexuals who tend toward finding a bed, rather than settling for a nasty stall in a public toilet) or hygiene.
Simply put, this type of sex is not done at “home”-—i.e., in the “privacy and comfort of one’s own home.” Therefore it does not support the establishment of a true “home,” which after all, is a place where people practice intimacy in multiple fundamental ways. One function of marriage is to create “homes,” but again, this type of sex is completely antagonistic to the function of a true “home.”
Even the few couples who do seem somewhat happy are so because they somehow became friends at a non-sexual level. But there is rarely monogamy . . . maybe celibacy as they grow older and exit the meat market, but that is all.