Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: goodnesswins
I'm not following. Why is it not a healthy and fertile young wife's moral obligation to have children with her husband?

Since some say gays can't marry because there's no procreation going on there, there's no POINT in a heterosexual couple bothering to marry if they're not going to have a family, right?

232 posted on 09/02/2008 2:01:53 PM PDT by newzjunkey (McCain-Palin. YES on CA PROP 4. (Family notification for underage abortions))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: newzjunkey

Um....the young woman loved her job as a teacher of about 25-30 students.....but didn’t want to become a mother herself, and I don’t think her husband was wanting fatherhood either......might be news to you....but some people have family histories that call into question whether they SHOULD be parents.....i.e. bi-polar, suicide, etc in the family tree....who are YOU to say they MUST procreate, as long as they support others who do? I think they are being “moral” by knowing their own limitations.


275 posted on 09/02/2008 2:48:36 PM PDT by goodnesswins (Palin has run a state, town and fishing operation. Obama ain't run nothin' but his mouth.(Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies ]

To: newzjunkey

And, furthermore....many childless couples are GREAT Aunts and Uncles to nephews and nieces. They have the time AND the money that sometimes the parents don’t.


276 posted on 09/02/2008 2:56:33 PM PDT by goodnesswins (Palin has run a state, town and fishing operation. Obama ain't run nothin' but his mouth.(Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson