Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Who is John Galt?
If anyone who considers the secession of the Southern States to have been been unconstitutional wants to be historically (and legally) accurate, maybe they should read the United States Constitution (as it then existed) instead...

"..., that I do not consider the proceedings of Virginia in ’98-’99 as countenancing the doctrine that a state may at will secede from its Constitutional compact with the other States. A rightful secession requires the consent of the others, or an abuse of the compact, absolving the seceding party from the obligations imposed by it." - James Madison, 1832

I'm pretty sure that Madison read the Constitution, and the Constitution in 1832 was identical to the Constitution in 1860. So obviously people of the time both read the Constitution and believed the Southern acts of unilateral secession to be wrong.

141 posted on 08/27/2008 9:50:37 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
James Madison, 1832

Gosh - I can't find that in the US Constitution. Care to provide a somewhat more specific reference?

164 posted on 08/27/2008 5:04:15 PM PDT by Who is John Galt? ("Sometimes I have to break the law in order to meet my management objectives." - Bill Calkins, BLM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson