Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Historian suggests Southerners defeated Confederacy
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution ^ | August 24, 2008 | Jim Auchmutey

Posted on 08/25/2008 9:11:18 AM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-252 next last
To: Some Fat Guy in L.A.
I know that there are places in Alabama where secession was not favored - Fort Payne, Alabama still has a “Union Park” because the secession was generally not supported in that area.

Fort Payne recently christened the park "City Park" so it is no longer "Union Park"... Also in that park is a huge statue of a confederate soldier... This was dedicated while most folks still rode horses to the event (I don't know the exact date)... Also they presented statues of the 4 Alabama (band) boys during this dedication (this summer).

So I guess Fort Payne has subcumbed to the political pressures of PCism renaming that park. I for one did not notice that the city slipped this under the door mat... Everyone was in favor of paying homage to the group Alabama that they didn't notice the city was changing the park title in the same slick event.

Having lived most my life here and from a long blue lintage in the area, I can concur there was lots of pro-union folks in this area.. and few slaves back in it's day. Valley Head had a small plantation with a slave quarters to it, but county wise not many did.

121 posted on 08/26/2008 4:59:49 PM PDT by LowOiL (Electile Dysfunction: the inability to become aroused over any of the choices for president in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Blade
Lee's resignation of his commission in the US Army was perhaps the most dishonorable act of his life.

Give me a break - his action was completely honorable.

If he had stayed true to his oath, the Civil War might have been over in 6 months, with a minimal loss of life.

Care to name ONE military action that occured during the first "6 months" of the war, where General Robert Lee held any significant authority?

With all due respect, please read some history...

122 posted on 08/26/2008 5:00:37 PM PDT by Who is John Galt? ("Sometimes I have to break the law in order to meet my management objectives." - Bill Calkins, BLM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep
Go look at the timeline of Virginia secession. Virginia joined the confederacy on April 23, 1861. The confederate legislature voted to move its capitol to Richmond on May 21. And finally, on May 23, Virginia ratified its act of secession. A month after joining the confederacy.

And, your point is?

123 posted on 08/26/2008 5:03:06 PM PDT by Who is John Galt? ("Sometimes I have to break the law in order to meet my management objectives." - Bill Calkins, BLM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Who is John Galt?

Virginia entered into a unconstitutional compact before actually making its secession official.


124 posted on 08/26/2008 5:09:56 PM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep
Virginia entered into a unconstitutional compact before actually making its secession official.

FYI:

AN ORDINANCE to repeal the ratification of the Constitution of the United State of America by the State of Virginia, and to resume all the rights and powers granted under said Constitution.

The people of Virginia in their ratification of the Constitution of the United States of America, adopted by them in convention on the twenty-fifth day of June, in the year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and eighty-eight, having declared that the powers granted under said Constitition were derived from the people of the United States and might be resumed whensoever the same should be perverted to their injury and oppression, and the Federal Government having perverted said powers not only to the injury of the people of Virginia, but to the oppression of the Southern slave-holding States:

Now, therefore, we, the people of Virginia, do declare and ordain, That the ordinance adopted by the people of this State in convention on the twenty-fifth day of June, in the year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and eighty-eight, whereby the Constitution of the United States of America was ratified, and all acts of the General Assembly of this State ratifying and adopting amendments to said Constitution, are hereby repealed and abrogated; that the union between the State of Virginia and the other States under the Constitution aforesaid is hereby dissolved, and that the State of Virginia is in the full possession and exercise of all the rights of sovereignty which belong and appertain to a free and independent State.

And they do further declare, That said Constitution of the United States of America is no longer binding on any of the citizens of this State.

This ordinance shall take effect and be an act of this day, when ratified by a majority of the voter of the people of this State cast at a poll to be taken thereon on the fourth Thursday in May next, in pursuance of a schedule hereafter to be enacted.

Adopted by the convention of Virginia April 17,1861.

Source: Official Records, Ser. IV, vol. 1, p. 223.

[ratified by a vote of 132,201 to 37,451 on May 23, 1861]

The secession ordinance was adopted April 17, citing the specific reservation of the right of secession that the State hade made, in writing (http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/const/ratva.htm), when it ratified the Constitution many years earlier:

We the Delegates of the People of Virginia duly elected in pursuance of a recommendation from the General Assembly and now met in Convention having fully and freely investigated and discussed the proceedings of the Federal Convention and being prepared as well as the most mature deliberation hath enabled us to decide thereon Do in the name and in behalf of the People of Virginia declare and make known that the powers granted under the Constitution being derived from the People of the United States may be resumed by them whensoever the same shall be perverted to their injury or oppression and that every power not granted thereby remains with them and at their will: that therefore no right of any denomination can be cancelled abridged restrained or modified by the Congress by the Senate or House of Representatives acting in any Capacity by the President or any Department or Officer of the United States except in those instances in which power is given by the Constitution for those purposes...

BTW, the action of the State convention was ratified by a 4 to 1 margin...

;>)

(Please see my FR home page for links to the source documents... ;>)

125 posted on 08/26/2008 5:25:52 PM PDT by Who is John Galt? ("Sometimes I have to break the law in order to meet my management objectives." - Bill Calkins, BLM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Some Fat Guy in L.A.
Fort Payne, Alabama still has a “Union Park” because the secession was generally not supported in that area.

"Union Park" was opened in 1910.. way after the civil war... in 1913 they put a huge confederate statue in the park...

Park is to the right area in this photo...

Most of the town by that time had huge influxes of people from the north that speculated that that town would be Birmingham (steel town)... The ingrediants were there (but they were inferior to B'ham, thus FP did not become Birmingham size wise)...

Why the name "Union Park" ? Well I don't know, but mom says the owner of that Hotel gave the property to make the park and he was a Yankee so perhaps he got to name it.. but it was named well after the war and after great Yankee influx in the area. It is odd that just 3 years after it's opening a huge statue of another one of my kinfolks was put up depicting a Confederate Officer.

126 posted on 08/26/2008 5:26:15 PM PDT by LowOiL (Electile Dysfunction: the inability to become aroused over any of the choices for president in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep
Virginia entered into a unconstitutional compact before actually making its secession official.

One simple question for you:

Are you suggesting that, if Virginia had waited a few months to confirm the action of the convention (which action was confirmed by approximately a 4-1 margin when voted upon), that the State's secession would have been 'legal,' and that you would therefore recognize the constitutional legality of the State's secession?

Hmmm?

You can answer 'yes' or 'no'...

;>)

127 posted on 08/26/2008 5:31:43 PM PDT by Who is John Galt? ("Sometimes I have to break the law in order to meet my management objectives." - Bill Calkins, BLM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Who is John Galt?
Article I, Section 10 says:

No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.

But it does NOT say:

No State shall, UNLESS IT HAS SECEDED, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.

Unless one wants to rewrite the Constitution thusly, it contains a flat prohibition against states exercising authority. Rewriting the document is the liberals way, a trap we should avoid.

What about the 10th Amendment? It reserves to the states and people powers not prohibited to them by the Constitution, but Article 1, Section 10 flatly and plainly prohibits actions of state sovereignty.

128 posted on 08/26/2008 6:26:17 PM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

Sorry, but your argument is simply idiotic...


129 posted on 08/26/2008 6:36:04 PM PDT by Who is John Galt? ("Sometimes I have to break the law in order to meet my management objectives." - Bill Calkins, BLM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Who is John Galt?
And what if a state joined the confederacy and allowed the CSA army to occupy into its territory before formally ratifying its act of secession?

If you believe unilateral secession is somehow constitutional, you must also admit then that Virginia violated the constitution by allowing "foreign troops" on it's soil before it had even had a vote on the secession question.

Even Rand thumping fundamentalist libertarians can't have it both ways, Mr. Gault.

130 posted on 08/26/2008 7:06:42 PM PDT by Ditto (Global Warming: The 21st Century's Snake Oil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Ditto
If you believe unilateral secession is somehow constitutional, you must also admit then that Virginia violated the constitution by allowing "foreign troops" on it's soil before it had even had a vote on the secession question.

You are assuming that a plebiscite is required, before a State may secede. Upon what do you base that assumption?

Hmmm?

Even Rand thumping fundamentalist libertarians can't have it both ways, Mr. Gault.

I don't have to 'have it both ways,' Dito...

;>)

131 posted on 08/26/2008 7:15:03 PM PDT by Who is John Galt? ("Sometimes I have to break the law in order to meet my management objectives." - Bill Calkins, BLM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: LowOiL
Your comments about the Unionists of Alabama is best exemplified by the story of Federal Judge Frank M. Johnson Jr., appointed by President Eisenhower in 1954. He was one of the very courageous Southern Republican judges appointed by President Eisenhower who broke Jim Crow's back. In Johnson's case, it was the Rosa Parks and the Montgomery Bus Boycott decision that ended segregation on public transit. He survived an assassination attempt after that decision. There were other Republican judges in the South then that made similar courageous decisions that upheld the Constitution over the racist entrenched Democrat establishment.

"Frank Minis Johnson Jr. was a back-country boy, and it explained a great deal about his fierce independence and stoicism. He was born in the small town of Haleyville on Oct. 30, 1918, the oldest of seven children of Frank and Alabama Long Johnson, who were farmers and teachers. His father later was a probate judge and became the only Republican in the Alabama Legislature.

The Johnson roots were in Winston County, in the remote hills of northwest Alabama. Long a Republican stronghold, the county rejected slavery and tried to secede from the state after Alabama left the Union in 1861. Styling itself the ''Free State of Winston,'' it tried to remain neutral in the Civil War, and eventually sent more men to fight for the Union than for the Confederacy.

Tough people!

132 posted on 08/26/2008 7:35:23 PM PDT by Ditto (Global Warming: The 21st Century's Snake Oil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Who is John Galt?
You are assuming that a plebiscite is required, before a State may secede. Upon what do you base that assumption?

Their had been no declaration either by convention, legislative action or public vote when Confederate troops were welcomed into their state. (None of those methods would have been legitimate BTW.)

The point is, they had accepted 'foreign troops' on their soil while they were still part of the United States. That is of course assuming they accepted the Montgomery government of Jefferson Davis as a legitimate nation. The rub with that is under the Constitution, they had no authority to recognize foreign governments.

So did they really believe in unilateral secession, or were they just playing legalistic games?

You know the answer. At least be honest about it.

133 posted on 08/26/2008 7:59:11 PM PDT by Ditto (Global Warming: The 21st Century's Snake Oil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Who is John Galt?
Idiotic? That's what the liberals and those who would usurp power from the people often say about strict construction of the Constitution. Strict construction, taking what the Constitution actually says over what we wish it would say, is often awkward, but is the safest guarantee of our liberty under the federal system. The Constitution flatly and clearly says that states may not exercise sovereign powers. You may cite extra-Constitutional authorities and opinions for what the Constitution plainly says, but if you do so I do not think you should pretend to be a strict constructionist.
134 posted on 08/26/2008 8:03:44 PM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner

Don’t forget to add General Morgan to the list.


135 posted on 08/26/2008 11:58:15 PM PDT by StoneWall Brigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

There’s a fable common in libertarian circles according to which the Confederates were defending what they took to be their rights against the government. In fact, probably most of those who fought for the Confederacy did so precisely in obedience to government (this must have been true of Lee, who had no other reason for taking the Confederate side). The Civil War was just what it has been called: the war between the states - the states as opposed to the people.


136 posted on 08/27/2008 5:06:03 AM PDT by Christopher Lincoln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Who is John Galt?
Give me a break - his action was completely honorable.

Reneging on your oath as an officer in order to not piss off your social set back home is hardly an honorable decision.

Care to name ONE military action that occured during the first "6 months" of the war, where General Robert Lee held any significant authority?

Lee was offered the command of the Union armies. If he had command of the Army of the Potomac early on in the war, with its massive advantage in resources and manpower, the early days of the war would have gone very, very differently. Lee would not have dickered for months like McLellan, but would have driven on Richomond and probably have taken it in short order.

137 posted on 08/27/2008 7:21:06 AM PDT by Citizen Blade ("Please... I go through everyone's trash." The Question)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Who is John Galt?
The secession ordinance was adopted April 17, citing the specific reservation of the right of secession that the State hade made, in writing

Crossing your fingers behind your back when you sign a contract does not relieve you of the obligations of that contract.

The interesting words in the Virginia Ordinance of Secession are:

This ordinance shall take effect and be an act of this day, when ratified by a majority of the voter of the people of this State cast at a poll to be taken thereon on the fourth Thursday in May next, in pursuance of a schedule hereafter to be enacted.
In other words, "We're going to do this right now and let the people vote on it to make it official in a month or so, after it's a done deal."
138 posted on 08/27/2008 9:29:05 AM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Who is John Galt?
You can answer 'yes' or 'no'...

That's easy. The answer is "no."

Now one for you: In your unilateral secession-allowing mind, was Virginia officially seceded from the United States when it joined the CSA and allowed CSA troops onto its soil, despite the secession convention's acts not having been ratified by the voters as required?

139 posted on 08/27/2008 9:38:25 AM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: count-your-change
Lincoln made clear in the 1858 debates his attitude toward blacks

What was Stephen Douglas's attitude towards blacks in 1858? Or Jefferson Davis', Robert Lee's, or Thomas Jackson's in 1860? Just curious.

140 posted on 08/27/2008 9:42:29 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-252 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson