[Mr. Silverback]

Saying that the findings of scientists in the intelligent design field aren’t valid because some creationists have written about it is like saying that GOP tax policy is a plan of the worldwide Jewish cabal because an orthodox Jewish banker worte an op-ed supporting it.

If NASA finds evidence that seems to support creationism (or at least call the current cosmology into question) and Ken Hamm puts it on his website, does that mean we have to scrap the space program because it’s a missionary organization?

[Soliton]

Saying that the findings of scientists in the intelligent design field aren’t valid because some creationists have written about it is like saying that GOP tax policy is a plan of the worldwide Jewish cabal because an orthodox Jewish banker worte an op-ed supporting it.

There have been no scientific findings in support of ID as admitted under oath by Michael Behe himself