To: BlessedMom92
Report ... The Network are quickly becoming enemies of a free America
2 posted on
08/20/2008 7:10:35 PM PDT by
clamper1797
(Nobama ... Karl Marx in black face)
To: BlessedMom92
Hillary will not be amused. And, FWIW, she has every right to be pi$$ed.
To: BlessedMom92
If Jeremiah Wright would have reared his ugly head before Iowa, rather than just before PA, Obama would have been a nonstarter.
5 posted on
08/20/2008 7:14:56 PM PDT by
KoRn
(CTHULHU '08 - I won't settle for a lesser evil any longer!)
To: BlessedMom92; All
You have to be real stupid not to see it.
6 posted on
08/20/2008 7:15:41 PM PDT by
KevinDavis
(If Obama can't handle a town hall debate, then he can't handle the job of being President.)
To: BlessedMom92
7 posted on
08/20/2008 7:16:55 PM PDT by
visualops
(artlife.us -nature photography desktop wallpapers)
To: BlessedMom92
eight-year Media Research Center study of the Big Three TV networks coverage of Barack ObamaI totally don't get it. Someone 'splain that to me.
8 posted on
08/20/2008 7:17:21 PM PDT by
krb
(If you're not outraged, people probably like having you around.)
To: BlessedMom92
When the media sell a candidate to sell a story, the candidate for POTUS, then it is time for the American people to revolt against the media. As Jesus turned the moneychangers’ tables in the temple, we need to turn the dial, cancel the subscription, surf to a new site. This is not a matter of journalism, it is a sales job - and not even for what they think is right, but what will sell.
9 posted on
08/20/2008 7:18:49 PM PDT by
DBCJR
(What would you expect?)
To: BlessedMom92
Are they sure they don’t mean 8 MONTH? How could there be an eight year study?
Maybe the group has been around for eight years.
11 posted on
08/20/2008 7:19:50 PM PDT by
madison10
(Are you ready for the Democrat Po-lympics!?)
To: BlessedMom92
It took a hundred times the positive coverage to gain that one-tenth of one percentage point edge.
To: BlessedMom92

it's pronounced:
DUH!!!
13 posted on
08/20/2008 7:20:19 PM PDT by
Chode
(American Hedonist - CTHULHU/NYARLATHOTEP'08 = Nothing LESS!!!)
To: BlessedMom92
Wonder why they even thought to tail this guy for eight years? Did they see the Obama love-fest blooming?
14 posted on
08/20/2008 7:22:02 PM PDT by
madison10
(Are you ready for the Democrat Po-lympics!?)
To: BlessedMom92
But Barack Obama had a crucial advantage over his rivals this year: the support of the national media, especially the three broadcast networks, an MRC report on the study states.There was ZERO downside to the propagandists support of Barack. First, it got them out from under the covers with/of Clinton Inc. Second, even if Barack loses to McCain, they can continue to run the racism/victim template against their ideological opponents and continue to act like advocates for the downtrodden. Third, if Barack wins, it validates the power of the propagandist, and they each remain a valuable entity in their twisted minds.
20 posted on
08/20/2008 7:46:47 PM PDT by
PGalt
To: BlessedMom92
I think that's what B. (whose middle name must never be spoken) Obama was referring to when he said that "McCain does not know what he is up against"!!
Obama has a point. No amount of money can buy the daily, repeated assistance that the MSM gives the Obama campaign.
Just ask Hillary.
23 posted on
08/20/2008 8:04:55 PM PDT by
stockstrader
(CHANGE--a euphemism for further dividing our country along racial, social and economic lines)
To: BlessedMom92
skewered stats.
Remove home states and hillary wins going away.
Obama won the Illinois primary by more than 600,000 votes, while Hillary won the New York primary by little more than 300,00 votes.
To: BlessedMom92
Will the Media Research Center also do a study that concludes “water is wet” later?
27 posted on
08/21/2008 5:33:48 AM PDT by
Arrowhead1952
(A vote for any Democrat from BO on down the ticket is a vote for $10 a gallon gas.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson