I have the book and I’m around page 90 now. It’s pretty good, but I heard last night that nine of the first 11 footnotes referred back to source material by Jerome Corsi. I’m at work but I will check that out when I get home. I did go to the Chicago Tribune article that he refers to repeatedly and the article definitely didn’t have the tone he gives it. What did you find on the footnotes?
I’ve yet to find what I could stamp a purposeful faslehood. Shades of negative are all over the texts, but that is to be expected with a book meant to ‘swiftboat’ this Marxist puppet. A couple of inaccuracies have arisen, but nothing to de-substantiate the assertions Corsi makes. I’m getting tired of running down the footnotes (lots of them are Ibids and op cit).