Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Boagenes
Which, of course, is why so many respected scientists have agreed that the Carbon-14 tests were flawed and Oxford University is doing new tests, last I heard?

The "flawed C-14 tests were accurate. They were taken under a very strict protocol and under direct observation of the Vatican and experts in carbon dating. Rogers received a specimen that was allegedly from the shroud without any protocol whatsoever. The original scientists stand by their results. If Rogers wants to prove them wrong, he will have to do another C-14 test. Something that will never happen. His vanillin dating test was invented by him as a bogus way to allow for a first century date. It is not only totally invalid, but borders on fraud.

89 posted on 08/11/2008 8:47:59 AM PDT by Soliton (> 100)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]


To: Soliton
You could use a dose of patience, Soli. Your posts are not so important that they warrant repeating. ;-)
90 posted on 08/11/2008 8:54:19 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson