Thank you very much for the feedback. I agree 100% with your views as they are mine. I was on one of the first MiTT and SPTT test Teams for the Military. I lived and fought with the Iraqi Commandos with my 10 man team. Outside of interpreters, there was no verbal communication. But, we fought and overcame the deficiencies through trial and error. Save the parkinglot concept for Iran...lol
This is what I was talking about. There should be at least one and preferably two 'native' speakers in every rifle squad. Having an IC embedded is great, but if you can't communicate in the heat of a battle, then he could end up being a liability, or worse a casualty, when the feces hits the fan.
The IC should also receive an intensive immersion style language program before being embedded. The three rules of battle are "Shoot. Move. COMMUNICATE." This communication should be as clear, succinct, and precise as possible.
Having 2 or 3 guys who can cross communicate would bring a lot of benefits IMO. Would it be pricey and time-consuming? Yep. Would it save some lives? I believe completely that it would.
Glad you found my meager contribution useful. Please allow me to wish you a speedy recovery and give you my most profound thanks for your service.
I know you're Army, but in this case I think a hearty virtual "Semper Fi" is completely appropriate.
Regards,
L
I love your tagline!!!