Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BATTLE OVER CONFEDERATE FLAG HITS HIGHWAYS
The Christian Science Monitor ^ | August 4, 2008 | Patrik Jonsson

Posted on 08/05/2008 12:11:25 PM PDT by cowboyway

TAMPA, FLA. - Chip Witte doesn't consider himself a Rebel. He doesn't hang Dixie battle flags in his living room, nor does he wear one on the back of his leather jacket.

Yet when the Tampa motorcycle mechanic saw the world's largest Confederate battle flag unfurl above the intersection of I-75 and I-4 in June, he felt a jolt of solidarity with the lost cause and lost rights that he says the battle flag represents. "I think it's great that they're allowed to fly it," says Mr. Witte. [Editor's note: The original version misidentified the highway intersection.]

(Excerpt) Read more at csmonitor.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Education; History; Local News; Society
KEYWORDS: battleflag; cause; cbf; confederacy; confederateflag; crossofsaintandrew; dixie; firstamendment; freespeech; lostcause; lostcauses; lostminds; saintandrewscross; voteforobama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-243 next last
To: AppyPappy

The flag doesn’t OFFEND me!! I grew up in the north (in Connecticut) and I moved about 13 miles from where the flag is FLYING (on private PROPERTY). If I was alive in the 1860s, I would have supported the STATE RIGHTS of the CSA. Sorry, they knew Washington DC was becoming power hungry, and they wanted to fight it. The CSA was right — and I know that we want STATE RIGHTS — not FEDERAL RIGHTS!!


121 posted on 08/07/2008 7:49:23 AM PDT by EagleandLiberty (Psst... Serious questions Conservatives - want McCain or a Marxist in the White House?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: EagleandLiberty
Sorry, but it is the truth.

Actually it isn't the truth at all. The Confederacy was definitely fighting to preserve and expand slavery. As the Confederacy's vice president publicly stated to universal Southern acclaim, the Confederacy was founded upon the principle of the subjugation of the black race.

The Southern states wanted the CONSITUTION as it was.

No they didn't. One of the most damning proofs of that is written into the Confederate Constitution. Under the US Constitution each state had the authority to decide for itself whether or not slavery would be legal. The Confederate Constitution strips the states of this power and imposes a federal guarantee of slavery in every Confederate state and territory.

This shows that not only was the Confederacy not about "states rights" - by eliminating one of the state powers under the US Constitution, but that the Confederacy was indeed about slavery, since it eliminated this state prerogative in favor of slavery.

They could see what was happening to the FEDERAL Government in DC. They didn't like what it was becoming.

What federal laws or policies had been enacted that the leaders of the Confederacy didn't like? Do you know?

122 posted on 08/07/2008 7:51:20 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Southern Fairy Tales??? WTF?


123 posted on 08/07/2008 7:52:57 AM PDT by EagleandLiberty (Psst... Serious questions Conservatives - want McCain or a Marxist in the White House?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

You must be a LIBERAL - I guess you are from the NORTH!!


124 posted on 08/07/2008 7:55:24 AM PDT by EagleandLiberty (Psst... Serious questions Conservatives - want McCain or a Marxist in the White House?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

No it was THE WAR OF NORTHERN AGGRESSION!! THE CSA wanted to peacefully succeed. The North started it!


125 posted on 08/07/2008 7:57:45 AM PDT by EagleandLiberty (Psst... Serious questions Conservatives - want McCain or a Marxist in the White House?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: EagleandLiberty
I would have supported the STATE RIGHTS of the CSA. Sorry, they knew Washington DC was becoming power hungry, and they wanted to fight it.

This is completely fictional.

The South was clamoring for an increase in federal power in 1860 - namely the power of federal marshals to forcibly extract escaped slaves from northern states.

This policy, demanded by the South, was far and away the most intrusive extension of federal power into the governance of the states in American history up to that point.

The South's complaint was that the federal government wasn't doing enough, not that it was doing too much.

126 posted on 08/07/2008 7:58:15 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: EagleandLiberty
No it was THE WAR OF NORTHERN AGGRESSION!!

So the attack on Fort Sumter was an act of Northern aggression? Really now?

And the invasion of Columbus, Kentucky by the Confederate army was an act of Northern aggression too, I suppose?

THE CSA wanted to peacefully succeed. The North started it!

The Confederacy had no desire for peace.

The entire reason for secession was the conflict over whether slavery could expand into federal territory or not.

Before the Confederacy attacked Fort Sumter, Confederate soldiers were already marching through Texas to seize the federal territory of New Mexico.

127 posted on 08/07/2008 8:06:22 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

I guess we will disagree on this. However, the FLAG is flying on PRIVATE PROPERTY and it should keep flying. If people don’t like it, sorry. The SCV owns the land it is flying from. I have the Welsh flag flying in front of my home along with the USA flag. Should I take down the WELSH flag? I could be offending my English (who moved from London) neighbor!!


128 posted on 08/07/2008 8:12:14 AM PDT by EagleandLiberty (Psst... Serious questions Conservatives - want McCain or a Marxist in the White House?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: EagleandLiberty
However, the FLAG is flying on PRIVATE PROPERTY and it should keep flying.

My very first comment on this thread was that the owners had every right to fly the flag.

Again, the revisionist history that Confederate enthusiasts indulge in is not only factually incorrect, it is morally questionable and completely unproductive.

129 posted on 08/07/2008 8:18:43 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: EagleandLiberty
You must be a LIBERAL - I guess you are from the NORTH!!

So anyone who doesn't swallow the Southron BS is a liberal? Typical, typical, typical.

130 posted on 08/07/2008 8:36:20 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: EagleandLiberty
No it was THE WAR OF NORTHERN AGGRESSION!!

THE WAR OF THE REBELLION, actually. If you want to shout it and all.

THE CSA wanted to peacefully succeed.

Then don't shoot up forts on your way out. It kind of blows that 'peacefully' part right out of the water. So to speak.

The North started it!

No, the confederacy did.

131 posted on 08/07/2008 8:39:32 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Your the one to talk about being Typical there N-S you’ve been playing the all confedreates are democrats card as of late.


132 posted on 08/07/2008 8:46:40 AM PDT by StoneWall Brigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: StoneWall Brigade
Your the one to talk about being Typical there N-S you’ve been playing the all confedreates are democrats card as of late.

I belive I once pointed out that the confederate cause in 1860 WAS a Democrat cause. All it's leaders and all it's supporters then were Democrats. Whatsamatta, you ashamed of your heritage or something?

133 posted on 08/07/2008 8:51:48 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: EagleandLiberty
You hit a nerve with the Church of Lincoln they bitch and moan about being called Liberals but they don't mind calling you a racists Neo-Confederate or a lost causer.
134 posted on 08/07/2008 8:53:03 AM PDT by StoneWall Brigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

I belive I pointed out to you that once the soutern states left the union and formed the there own country they where no longer democrats btw let’s talk about your heritage?


135 posted on 08/07/2008 8:57:55 AM PDT by StoneWall Brigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: rjp2005

Its not public, it’s private.
Either way, I support it being flown. The confederates stood for SO MUCH more than a simple right to slavery. (as the liberals like to push)


136 posted on 08/07/2008 9:01:18 AM PDT by FateRewritten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: StoneWall Brigade
they don't mind calling you a racists Neo-Confederate or a lost causer.

What is the preferred term for an individual who argues in favor of the Confederate cause?

137 posted on 08/07/2008 9:01:21 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: EagleandLiberty

swattie, is that you?!


138 posted on 08/07/2008 9:16:40 AM PDT by rockrr (Global warming is to science what Islam is to religion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: FateRewritten

Ok it’s private land, I understand.

I’ll leave it at that.


139 posted on 08/07/2008 9:19:14 AM PDT by rjp2005 (Lord have mercy on us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
I belive I once pointed out that the confederate cause in 1860 WAS a Democrat cause. All it's leaders and all it's supporters then were Democrats.

That factoid was lost on George B. McClellan when he ran against Lincoln as a Democrat.

140 posted on 08/07/2008 9:19:30 AM PDT by Hacksaw (Deport illegals the same way they came here - one at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-243 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson