Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MEGoody
Then you are the one consistent evolutionist I've run into. Every other time I've asked that question, all I've gotten is sputtering and fuming. Often, I've been told that Darwin never put forth such a conjecture.

The reason is that "less evolved" isn't a Darwinian concept. Nothing is more evolved or less evolved in a qualitative way. You can say more evolved quantitatively if you simply mean more evolutionary steps.

11 posted on 07/30/2008 12:52:35 PM PDT by Soliton (Investigate, study, learn, then express an opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Soliton
You can say more evolved quantitatively if you simply mean more evolutionary steps.

Perhaps that is what Darwin believed. I do know that this view of the evolution of man guided his view of the races. I'm not trying to use this to disparage Darwin any more than I would any other person of his time who thought blacks were less intelligent, less 'human' than whites.

12 posted on 07/30/2008 1:51:07 PM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall cause you to vote against the Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson