Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: WorkingClassFilth

That was a curious detail in the article. I’m not too sure (for one thing) that the lake is 25 million years old, but regardless, how far down will they be looking? Also, if the intent is to look on the bottom for ancient artifacts washed in when the big glacial dams let go and cubic miles of meltwater tore lose everything in their path and dumped it into the overflowing Baikal, wouldn’t it make more sense to look upstream? ;’)


28 posted on 07/28/2008 9:56:30 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_________________________Profile updated Friday, May 30, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv
If there are artifacts in the lake, it could be a unique find.

In the case of North America, between the glacial periods and the periods where the ocean covered much of the land, IMO, most evidence of former inhabitants and their way of life would have been scrubbed from existence.

30 posted on 07/29/2008 4:00:49 AM PDT by wolfcreek (I see miles and miles of Texas....let's keep it that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson