Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

545 People
Vanity | Charlie Reese

Posted on 07/28/2008 9:20:10 AM PDT by calex59

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: null and void

Well then you were lied to, because you can be president. You are a natural born citizen, period. If you are not natural born then you are not a citizen at all unless you passed the naturalization for citizenship. So, BS.


41 posted on 07/28/2008 12:55:12 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: null and void

I am beginning to have a grudging admiration for you. You hang in there and defend what you believe is right. Gotta love you for that. Take care.
Calex59


42 posted on 07/28/2008 1:33:46 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: calex59
Ummmmm, I am unquestionably and inarguably a natural born citizen.

McCain cannot say the same. The left has all the documentation, and hundreds of years of jurisprudence, to question and argue his constitutional suitability to be the Commander in Chief.

Me? I think he's qualified.

But what you and I think doesn't matter. ONLY what the Supremes say matters on this one.

I wouldn't take a bet on what that will be at any odds!

43 posted on 07/28/2008 1:35:27 PM PDT by null and void (Barack Obama - International Man of Mystery...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: calex59

Then we agree about each other.

Should you ever be in Silicon Valley, drop me a line, I think we’d enjoy yapping over a couple liquid refreshments.


44 posted on 07/28/2008 1:37:25 PM PDT by null and void (Barack Obama - International Man of Mystery...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: null and void

*sigh* Should be:

“Me? I think he’s both qualified and not qualified.”

I meant to say that although he has the skills and patriotism necessary to successfully execute the duties of the Office, he doesn’t meet all the qualifications listed in the employment ad.

(Which BTW hasn’t stopped me from getting jobs!)


45 posted on 07/28/2008 1:45:10 PM PDT by null and void (Barack Obama - International Man of Mystery...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Should you ever be in Silicon Valley, drop me a line, I think we’d enjoy yapping over a couple liquid refreshments.

You got that right. I think it would be fun talking to you in person. Take care. Cale59

46 posted on 07/28/2008 3:07:55 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: calex59

i was just thinking the other day,

the only control we have over the government

is to not re-elect any politician.


47 posted on 07/28/2008 4:17:48 PM PDT by ken21 (people die and you never hear from them again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calex59

Monday edition of Captain Obvious.


48 posted on 07/28/2008 4:22:33 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Constantly choosing the lesser of two evils is still choosing evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: calex59
With the exception of President (who is term limited) I simply do not ever even consider voting for incumbents.

I've read all of the reasons why this is ill advised.

Yeah, and I still do not vote to keep the “professionals” in office.

49 posted on 07/28/2008 5:46:12 PM PDT by Radix (Think it is bad now? Wait until you have to press "2" for English!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calex59
If you don’t vote your ideals then you will get someone who doesn’t believe as you do, who wants to ruin the country or to merely line their pockets or just to keep power.

I think we actually have someone running against our Congress-critter this year (a Demo-rat, I AM in the Bay Area, after all) this year, after two straight unopposed runs.

So, in '04 and '06, I did vote against the incumbent. Of course, I had to write-in someone. A fat lot of good it did, huh?

50 posted on 07/28/2008 7:38:20 PM PDT by ssaftler (Obamaführer in '08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: null and void; calex59

You are providing reasons for the intent of the Constitution. (Which is a good thing).


51 posted on 07/28/2008 7:45:34 PM PDT by eyedigress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: subterfuge
Charlie is a senile old palenstinian loving coot. His premise is right, but he puts far too little of the blame where it belongs-—with DEMS/RINOs/Liberals.

I agree. There are many in Congress and a few on the Supreme Court whom I would like to see stay and gain in influence. This "Throw them all out" mantra is usually by people who don't like their own representatives, the only ones they can have influence over, and they have not been able to affect them or get rid of them. So they want to throw everybody out, the good with the bad.

52 posted on 07/28/2008 7:50:46 PM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jo Nuvark

Thanks for the ping.


53 posted on 07/28/2008 9:13:00 PM PDT by GOPJ (Global Warming's the new horse to ride for totalitarians - it's a mean one trick pony.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson