Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DemonDeac
Neighbors in the area tell 24 Hour News 8 that they saw emergency crews at the same home earlier this summer because of the dog attacking another person in the home.

"We actually confronted him about it because we were very concerned for our own children," said Dave Bos, who lives across the street from where the attack happened. "It breaks my heart to see that a young child like that...had to lose his arm as a result of it. It's very depressing," he said.

Another neighbor, Doug Resman, says he even tried contacting law enforcement about the dog.

"They just said you have to wait until something else happens," said Resman.
8 posted on 07/27/2008 5:07:21 PM PDT by MaryFromMichigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: MaryFromMichigan

What can the parents be charged with? Clearly the dog was a known danger and they were extremely negligent.


9 posted on 07/27/2008 5:11:34 PM PDT by DemonDeac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: MaryFromMichigan; DemonDeac

We were taught in law school that under the English Common Law, “every dog is entitled to one bite.” That old presumption flies in the face of this new American breed which started in the middle 19th century. Some jurisdictions simply ban the Pit Bull. I would suggest a rebuttable presumption of reckless endangerment (gross misdemeanor) in any biting case with such animals. Or a more severe presumption against the dog’s master, such as intent.

And killing such dogs is imperative.


12 posted on 07/27/2008 5:57:40 PM PDT by Unknowing (Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson