Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: cowboyway
Your original statement was to imply that "cooks, servants, laborers, and the like" were unimportant, less than honorable roles and now you're trying to weasel out of it with this typical NS rhetoric. Pathetic.

Hardly.

Can you be specific about this "certain percentage" or is this just more of your biased conjecture.

More than zero and less than a hundred. It disputes those who would claim that, being slaves, none of the blacks supporting the confederate army could be considered to be their willingly, and disputes those like you who apparently think they all were.

By that statement, you're admitting that the Confederacy was, indeed, legal?

No. Legally based on what passed for law in the confederacy.

How many times have you blathered that the Confederacy never existed because it was illegal to secede?

Quite a few. How many times have you insisted that it did because the folks down there believed it did?

You can quit these threads now. You're busted.

ROTFLMAO!

79 posted on 07/29/2008 7:50:44 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
ROTFLMAO!

Careful. They'll put in that straight jacket again...........

80 posted on 07/29/2008 11:50:44 AM PDT by cowboyway ("The beauty of the Second Amendment is you won't need it until they try to take it away"--Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson