Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur; TexConfederate1861
There were probably more than that. The confederate army needed a lot of cooks, servants, laborers, and the like.

Is serving in the military as "cooks, servants, laborers, and the like" dishonorable in your eyes, NS?

75 posted on 07/29/2008 5:47:48 AM PDT by cowboyway ("The beauty of the Second Amendment is you won't need it until they try to take it away"--Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: cowboyway
Is serving in the military as "cooks, servants, laborers, and the like" dishonorable in your eyes, NS?

No, but the implication you all are trying to make is that there were tens of thousands of blacks in combat roles in the confederate army, serving side by side with their white comrades as brothers in arms and valued fellow soldiers, blah, blah, blah. Nothing could be further from the truth. Tens of thousands of blacks served the confederate army in support roles. A certain percentage probably did so willingly. Blacks did not serve legally in combat roles until March 1865.

77 posted on 07/29/2008 5:54:09 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson